header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes

 (Read 3024530 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31194
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32746 on: June 11, 2024, 01:26:35 PM »
The more years I exist, the more I think they simply never learned what hypocrisy means, and so with that ignorance, it's not such a big character flaw when you look in the mirror. 

The bible-thumping team is the team cool with Trump's words and actions.  It literally makes no sense.
Words and actions in his official capacity. Outside of that, they just hold their noses.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83028
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32747 on: June 11, 2024, 01:32:56 PM »
A lot of "Bible thumpers" out there really dislike Trump, maybe most of them, but they don't see a viable second option.  

And yes, some of them slavishly eat up whatever he says, but I think it's not all, or even most.  The BTs I know personally pretty well dislike him quite a bit.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9366
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32748 on: June 11, 2024, 01:49:07 PM »
Most experts agree that it will be overturned. It's just a convenience right now for team 46.

I'm not gonna play in that sandbox.
Do most experts? I feel like I’ve seen a mixed bag, just because of how tricky appeals can be. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83028
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32749 on: June 11, 2024, 01:51:16 PM »
Do most experts? I feel like I’ve seen a mixed bag, just because of how tricky appeals can be.
Most experts on Fox News think it will be over turned, most on MSNBC laugh at the notion.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31194
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32750 on: June 11, 2024, 02:03:36 PM »
I put a lot of stock in Alan Dershowitz - a liberal and noted Trump hater.

*************

Dershowitz said he was unclear what exactly the crimes Trump was convicted of were. 

"I still don’t know what he was convicted of," he said. "Was he convicted of intent to cheat on his taxes two years later, although he didn’t take it as a deduction? Was he convicted of defrauding voters, who obviously knew that he was a sexual scoundrel?"

"Was he convicted of seeking to make an illegal campaign contribution, although the contribution didn’t have to be listed until after the election?" Dershowitz asked.


"I have never seen a case where, even after the verdict came down, we don’t know what he was convicted of," Dershowitz continued. "No one in history — in history — has ever been convicted of failing to disclose hush money payments paid to somebody."


"Why would anybody pay hush money if they had to disclose it?" he asked. "This is a case where the prosecutor simply decided to get Trump."


U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45617
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32751 on: June 11, 2024, 02:13:28 PM »
the prosecutor nearly always wants to get someone

it's up to the judge to decide the case
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

longhorn320

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10053
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32752 on: June 11, 2024, 02:17:16 PM »
The more years I exist, the more I think they simply never learned what hypocrisy means, and so with that ignorance, it's not such a big character flaw when you look in the mirror. 

The bible-thumping team is the team cool with Trump's words and actions.  It literally makes no sense.
Maybe the voters are just tired of the continual embarrassment on the world stage

They won't let me give blood anymore. The burnt orange color scares the hell out of the doctors.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31194
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32753 on: June 11, 2024, 02:21:04 PM »
the prosecutor nearly always wants to get someone

it's up to the judge to decide the case
Of course they do.

This guy campaigned on "getting" one person. That's extremely rare.

So yeah, he "got" Trump.

This is the same DA who releases illegals that attack police.

Great guy, for sure. Very stand-up.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22281
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32754 on: June 11, 2024, 02:25:54 PM »
There's no candidate, and no platform, and no party, that represents 100% of my views.  I'm sure this is true of many if not most people.

So the best I can do is find ways to prioritize my values, and vote for candidates that come closest to representing those prioritized values, for the purposes of whatever office or function we're electing.

This means that I'm sometimes (or, likely, always) going to be voting for someone who doesn't reflect my own values in every sense, but I've chosen to vote for that person because in the ways I find most important for that function or office, we are in agreement.  There might be things about that person I really dislike personally, but I'm not voting in a popularity contest, I'm voting  for that candidate to conduct policy in a manner consistent with my views.

And of course I prioritize different things depending on the level of office.  For a president, their take on foreign policy is going to be probably the most important priority for me.  For city mayor, I'm going to care a lot more about their approach to homelessness and traffic issues.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83028
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32755 on: June 11, 2024, 02:32:17 PM »
I decided a while back to stop voting for whoever is the lesser of two evils.  I'm not going to vote for someone I really can't support just because the other guy is worse.

I also realize my single vote is statistically irrelevant, so it's not as if my choice means anything beyond anyone but me.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31194
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32756 on: June 11, 2024, 02:36:07 PM »
There's no candidate, and no platform, and no party, that represents 100% of my views.  I'm sure this is true of many if not most people.

So the best I can do is find ways to prioritize my values, and vote for candidates that come closest to representing those prioritized values, for the purposes of whatever office or function we're electing.

This means that I'm sometimes (or, likely, always) going to be voting for someone who doesn't reflect my own values in every sense, but I've chosen to vote for that person because in the ways I find most important for that function or office, we are in agreement.  There might be things about that person I really dislike personally, but I'm not voting in a popularity contest, I'm voting  for that candidate to conduct policy in a manner consistent with my views.

And of course I prioritize different things depending on the level of office.  For a president, their take on foreign policy is going to be probably the most important priority for me.  For city mayor, I'm going to care a lot more about their approach to homelessness and traffic issues.
Exactly this. I will never NOT vote. That is an absolute.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83028
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32757 on: June 11, 2024, 02:50:30 PM »
I prefer not voting myself.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45617
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32758 on: June 11, 2024, 02:51:51 PM »
I don't have to worry about it
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9366
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Catch all thread - Personal attacks will result in a time out
« Reply #32759 on: June 11, 2024, 02:57:57 PM »
I put a lot of stock in Alan Dershowitz - a liberal and noted Trump hater.

*************

Dershowitz said he was unclear what exactly the crimes Trump was convicted of were.

"I still don’t know what he was convicted of," he said. "Was he convicted of intent to cheat on his taxes two years later, although he didn’t take it as a deduction? Was he convicted of defrauding voters, who obviously knew that he was a sexual scoundrel?"

"Was he convicted of seeking to make an illegal campaign contribution, although the contribution didn’t have to be listed until after the election?" Dershowitz asked.


"I have never seen a case where, even after the verdict came down, we don’t know what he was convicted of," Dershowitz continued. "No one in history — in history — has ever been convicted of failing to disclose hush money payments paid to somebody."


"Why would anybody pay hush money if they had to disclose it?" he asked. "This is a case where the prosecutor simply decided to get Trump."



I think the idea of him being a hater might be a bit in accurate. Dershowitz literally wrote a book defending the former president and joined his legal team at some point. In fact, through most of this it has seemed that Dershowitz has been sympathetic.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.