Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

.
.
My idea is to ask:  why stop there? Why not go down to the county level?
.

The reason for a state to do that would be allowing the people to legislate it in their areas.  ANYONE who props up "let the states decide for themselves" has to acknowledge that letting each county decide for themselves is the same idea, just better. 
.
If not, then you're just being politically blind.
.
It means more people are pleased with the outcome.  Isn't that what it's all about?  Take Texas - the state goes no abortions, angering majorities in the blue counties.  But if each county decides, there are no angry majorities.  Doing it state-by-state is like painting with a roller, but leaving it up to each county, you're painting with a brush.
.
This is an honest-to-goodness middle-line, moderate idea I'm putting out there.  I really don't see any problem with it. 

Erdogan says Turkey will block Sweden and Finland from joining NATO- which requires unanimous consent from current members to add new members. THANK GOD that there is an adult in the room. Even if that adult happens to be an ahole dictator thug like Erdogan. Sweden and Finland really are very much worthless to NATO anyway. Turkey on the other hand is of great strategic and geographical importance for obvious reasons. US will be PISSED obviously as NATO expansion is an openly stated imperial goal of the worlds lone imperial superpower,  but not sure there's much they can or will do about it.

Interesting

Did Turkey say why they will block

That would be up to the legislature of each state. The Fed Gov't nor the Supreme Court can mandate that any state would have to do such a thing.

I'm not suggesting anything be mandated, I'm saying it's a better idea.