header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)

 (Read 33816 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71186
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #420 on: April 14, 2020, 07:10:31 AM »
An important detail about veteran suicide rates is that a significant majority are over 50, many over 70, these are not recently returning veterans committing suicide.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18803
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #421 on: April 14, 2020, 11:17:20 AM »
Oh, okay.  That makes it better.  ~???
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71186
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #422 on: April 14, 2020, 11:22:41 AM »
It doesn't make anything better, but it adds some useful context if anyone thought that those returning from recent conflicts were being driven to suicide as a result in unusually high numbers.

It's not meant to say it's better obviously.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #423 on: April 14, 2020, 01:35:16 PM »
A response from 'Fro to MH got me thinking.





We all knew New Orleans was under sea level.
Fro: "Still is."

**********************************************

Me: 

Let's take a look at the budget expense to keep that city dry (until a Cat 5 hits). I think I will do that. Very difficult numbers to come by, but I'll do my best.

U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71186
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #424 on: April 14, 2020, 01:54:53 PM »
Maybe they could build levees to protect the city.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17625
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #425 on: April 14, 2020, 03:28:22 PM »
And then you could drive your Chevy there.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18803
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #426 on: April 14, 2020, 03:35:46 PM »
Maybe building cities below sea level between a massive river and the ocean isn't too bright.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1243
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #427 on: April 14, 2020, 03:46:41 PM »
Maybe the idea of moving, or closing one of the most culturally significant large cities in the United States, one of the urban anchors of the South, with a population of about 1.3 million people is a really hard one to get any traction for.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #428 on: April 14, 2020, 03:53:28 PM »
How about only those portions of the city and its surroundings which fall below sea level be closed? Sound like a good plan?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18803
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #429 on: April 14, 2020, 04:13:47 PM »
Maybe the idea of moving, or closing one of the most culturally significant large cities in the United States, one of the urban anchors of the South, with a population of about 1.3 million people is a really hard one to get any traction for.
Oh, okay.  Well you're right, we rebuilt it in the same place....because of...what?  Tradition?  
Being culturally significant doesn't seem as important when you're under 12 feet of water.  I'm sick and tired of tradition > intelligence......it's not just this, it's a 100 other ways that tradition wins out, and it's brutally stupid.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #430 on: April 14, 2020, 04:19:16 PM »
And brutally expensive.

Have I mentioned the story of the lucrative contract I pulled out of after Katrina hit? Astonishing numbers, and my piece was "only" 3 percent of only one of the massive construction projects. There were thousands of massive construction projects. Still are.

Lots of people made a lot of money - stupid money - off of that thing, and still are. Yet, the city remains in grave danger. Everything was redesigned and rebuilt to withstand a Cat 3 hurricane. Ummm...
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

rolltidefan

  • Global Moderator
  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2219
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #431 on: April 14, 2020, 04:27:15 PM »
technically, it wasn't built below sea level, it sank after it was built. but the act of building and developing it is at least part, if no the primary, reason it's sinking.

saving the part that's above sea level and moving on from the rest seems sensible, but much or most of the quintessential new orleans is the part that's at/below sea level. might as well find somewhere new and start over at that point.

large cities with significant cultural influences have been abandoned before, just not in our country/culture (that i'm aware).

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71186
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #432 on: April 14, 2020, 04:38:01 PM »
I read somewhere that NO was above sea level when it was built.  The river would flood the area and deposit silt which offset the normal sinkage that occurs.

They build levees and the flooding stopped, usually, so no more silt.  Subsidence.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #433 on: April 14, 2020, 04:43:54 PM »
technically, it wasn't built below sea level, it sank after it was built. but the act of building and developing it is at least part, if no the primary, reason it's sinking.

saving the part that's above sea level and moving on from the rest seems sensible, but much or most of the quintessential new orleans is the part that's at/below sea level. might as well find somewhere new and start over at that point.

large cities with significant cultural influences have been abandoned before, just not in our country/culture (that i'm aware).
That's not entirely true. There were several parts that were expanded into - sprawl - after the original city was planned. That part was, and still is, above sea level. Comfortably above, mind you. 20+ feet. See the map below. The areas on the other side of the river are problematic, and always were. Yes, they have sunk over the years. The soils do not have proper bearing capacity to support urban development. Never have, and never will.


U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.