header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Federal Debt and Deficit

 (Read 11506 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #28 on: July 24, 2024, 03:01:09 PM »


This shows the impact on tax REVENUE, which is the important thing.  This is "Hauser's Law" (which isn't a law, but it looks like one).

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #29 on: July 24, 2024, 03:02:06 PM »
It took decades to create the problem and it'll take more decades to fix it.  

As for right now, today, it's irrelevant.  It's a runaway train that doesn't affect people's daily lives.  Some day it will crash into a powder keg and the U.S. will become a desperate beggar when it comes to international finance.


“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #30 on: July 24, 2024, 03:05:33 PM »

It really took  about one decade for this to become a critical issue, not "decades".  

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10619
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #31 on: July 24, 2024, 03:08:43 PM »
Explain marginal rate.  Like when you throw out "top marginal rate was 70%", I don't quite know what that means.  I kind of think it means that income above a certain level is taxed at 70%, but it seems really high no matter what. 
It is the rate "at the margin" or, in other words, the rate of tax that you would pay on one dollar of additional income or the rate that you would save on one dollar in additional deductions.  

Example from the chart that @Cincydawg presented above (using single because it is presented first):
If your taxable income is less than $11,600 you pay a rate of 10%.  If you find a $1 deduction, that will save you $0.10 and if you earn an extra dollar you'll pay $0.10 in tax on that extra (marginal) dollar.  

If your taxable income is between $11,600 and $47,150 you pay 10% on the first $11,600 and 12% on everything in excess of $11,600 so your marginal rate is 12%.  

If your taxable income is between $47,150 and $100,525 you pay:
  • 10% on the first $11,600
  • 12% on the taxable income between $11,600 and $47,150
  • 22% on taxable income in excess of $47,150
. . . 
If your taxable income is in excess of $609,350 you pay:
  • 10% on the first $11,600
  • 12% on the taxable income between $11,600 and $47,150
  • 22% on the taxable income between $47,150 and $100,525
  • 24% on the taxable income between $100,525 and 191,950
  • 32% on the taxable income between $191,950 and $243,725
  • 35% on the taxable income between $243,725 and $487,450
  • 37% on taxable income in excess of $609,350
We talk about marginal rates because even if you have $1M in income you don't pay 37% on all of it, only on the portion in excess of $609,350.  That said, the marginal rate is the relevant rate to consider when making decisions because it is the rate you would pay on additional income or save on additional deductions.  


OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #32 on: July 24, 2024, 03:10:59 PM »
Really?
Do you know what a trend line is, pops?

“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10619
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #33 on: July 24, 2024, 03:16:23 PM »
Really?
Yes, really.  

As recently as the early 2000's Debt as a percentage of GDP was shrinking and it was stable up until the credit bubble of 2008.  Stable debt isn't an urgent problem.  It is something you might want to work on but it isn't crushing you.  

The response to the credit bubble was a MASSIVE spending spree that pushed the debt up from <40% of GDP to over 70% of GDP.  Then it leveled off a little (but was STILL growing) until COVID when an even bigger MASSIVE spending spree sent the debt to >100% of GDP.  That is an urgent problem.  The only time in our history that we've had debt this high is at the end of WWII and it was paid down immediately.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31042
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #34 on: July 24, 2024, 03:17:38 PM »
Really?
Do you know what a trend line is, pops?


From 2000 to 2008 not terrible. From 1996 to 2000, great. From 2016 to 2020 not terrible.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #35 on: July 24, 2024, 04:03:36 PM »
So we'll have no debt in fewer than say...30 years? 

Mkay.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #36 on: July 24, 2024, 04:17:18 PM »
It's pretty obvious the radical rise in debt is over the last 12 years or so.  Before that, it bounced around some ups, some downs, but we've had one steep up followed by a more modest up and then a very steep up.  When debt is around 50% of GDP, it's "OK".  Now it isn't, and it's going to get worse, though we COULD have a few years of moderate ups, and maybe even a slight down in the ratio.

Heaven help us if we hit a serious recession.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31042
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #37 on: July 24, 2024, 04:19:17 PM »
100 years, maybe. 

But we ALL have to pay more taxes, that is certain. At the same time, spending needs to not increase.

I'd be for a flat tax. Everyone making poverty level of more pays the same rate. No deductions, no loopholes. The IRS is abolished. Tax lawyers and accountants hate me.

I hate the IRS.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #38 on: July 24, 2024, 04:37:57 PM »
Why a common recession indicator doesn&#039;t seem to be working anymore (cnbc.com)
Why a common recession indicator doesn't seem to be working anymore (cnbc.com)

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10619
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #39 on: July 24, 2024, 04:40:39 PM »
I just searched this thread. Words with "spend" appear in this thread 8x. Words with the term "tax" appears, "zero" times. If Americans cannot speak on both sides of the issue deficits will continue to be unsolvable - at least until deficits and national debt end in an existential crisis.
Going a little deeper on this revenues vs expenditures question, here are all of the years since 1930 in which the Federal Deficit was >5% of GDP ranked.  Then I've added Federal Revenue as a percentage of GDP for that year:
  • 29.6%, 1943, 11.8%
  • 22.2%, 1944, 19.5%
  • 21.0%, 1945, 19.8%
  • 14.7%, 2020, 16.0%
  • 13.9%, 1942, 8.8%
  • 12.1%, 2021, 17.2%
  • 9.8%, 2009, 14.5%
  • 8.7%, 2010, 14.4%
  • 8.4%, 2011, 14.8%
  • 7.0%, 1946, 17.3%
  • 6.7%, 2012, 15.1%
  • 6.3%, 2023, 16.2%
  • 5.9%, 1983, 16.5%
  • 5.8%, 1934, 4.4%
  • 5.4%, 2022, 19.0%
  • 5.4%, 1936, 4.7%

A couple things jump out at me:

First, most of these are in response to MAJOR calamities:
WWII, 5:
The three largest, four of the largest five, and five of the largest 10 annual deficits are either during the war (1942-1945) or severely impacted by wind-down expenditures associated with the war (1946).  

The Great Depression, 2:
Two of these years involved massive spending increases related to FDR's "New Deal" which was an effort to get us out of the Great Depression (1934, 1936).  

COVID, 1:
2020's massive deficit of 14.7% of GDP occurred despite fairly normal revenue at 16% of GDP and note that even if revenue had been at record high levels approaching 20% the deficit STILL would have been double-digits and higher than anything seen since WWII.  

1970's/1980's Stagflation crisis:
The 1983 deficit involved tax cuts and spending increases undertaken in a successful effort to break out of the stagflation of the era.  

The Credit Bubble, 3:
2009-2011 involved increased spending AND decreased revenue as a result of the credit bubble and associated responses.  Revenues for 2009-2011 were relatively low historically at 14.4-14.8% of GDP but the deficits were 8.4% and greater so even "modern normal" revenues of about 17.5% of GDP would still have resulted in deficits in excess of 5% of GDP.  

That leaves four years unaccounted for:
  • 12.1% deficit in 2021, revenues at 17.2% of GDP.  That revenue figure is pretty close to the modern average so this is an expenditure not a revenue problem.  
  • 6.7% deficit in 2012, revenues at 15.1% of GDP.  That revenue figure is a bit light and "modern normal" revenues of around 17.5% would have pushed this deficit below 5% of GDP so this one is arguably revenue based.  
  • 6.3% deficit in 2023, revenues at 16.2% of GDP.  Even if revenues had been a "modern normal" 17.5% the deficit STILL would have been right at 5%.  
  • 5.4% deficit in 2022, revenues at 19.0% of GDP.  Historically that is a VERY high revenue figure so this is absolutely an expenditure rather than a revenue problem.  


Our responses to the credit bubble and COVID were make it seem like those were the biggest two events since WWII and in the case of COVID, that it was on par with WWII.  2024 will be our fifth consecutive year of deficits in excess of 5% of GDP.  We haven't seen that since WWII (1942-1946).  We were able to recover from the humongous deficits of WWII because from 1947-1974 our budgets were more-or-less balanced with surpluses some years and deficits others but deficits never exceeding 3% of GDP.  

The problem this presents is we don't have any extra room for a response to some future calamity.  What are we going to do if we get into our first recession in almost 20 years or another calamity like COVID or 9/11 hits?  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #40 on: July 24, 2024, 04:45:31 PM »
We'd have to inflate our way back to some semblance of balance.  The Fed would step in of course with "QE Infinity" which would dump liquiduty into the "system".

It would get ugly quickly, to the point of challenging the very basis of the country being a country.

The government "solutions" of late as you note is to dump money into the economy, vast sums creating enormous deficits.  Then the Fed rides in with QE.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Federal Debt and Deficit
« Reply #41 on: July 24, 2024, 06:24:44 PM »
100 years, maybe.

But we ALL have to pay more taxes, that is certain. At the same time, spending needs to not increase.

Exactly.  100 years of higher taxes and getting less for them.
People won't stand for that.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.