Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

Clemson opened at -21 over aTm. Dropped overnight to -15.

Michigan favored in all games here, too. Could be the first time for that in 20 years. Though the OSU line is several points closer than for the ones published a week back.

Yeah that opened at -6.5. Now at -3. I have the opening lines copied but it won't paste here. All I get is this:

Week 0

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4

Week 5

Week 6

Week 7

Week 8

Week 9

Week 10

Week 11

Week 12

Week 13

Week 14

Week 15

Yeah that opened at -6.5. Now at -3.

I can't explain the copy/paste issue. Sometimes that's just 010000110001 witchery. As for the M/OSU line, is this the same source and it's moved by 3.5 or is it a separate source with its own ideas?

I don't get this, from Betonline.AG.

Oklahoma -11.5 vs. UCLA

Oklahoma -17 vs. Texas

Oklahoma -21 vs. TCU

The only one that makes any sense to me is the UCLA line.

OU has clearly had better teams than Texas for every year of the last five, yet has only gone 4-2 and has won those four by an average of 6.75 points.

This year, OU will be starting someone other than Baker Mayfield or Kyler Murray at QB, and will be starting at least four new offensive linemen.  Meanwhile, Texas is resurgent and figures to be better than last year, when the Horns won the regular-season game 48-45.

I don't get a 17-point spread.  Texas fans will surely bet that one down to single digits, I think.

Regarding TCU, Gary Patterson always has a good defense.  21 seems like about 7 points too many.

OTOH, UCLA figures to be terrible.  I wish we had never scheduled that series.  UCLA is supposed to be OU's "marquee" game.  But the opening game vs. Houston figures to be better.

From a novice: Can these numbers actually be bet on today, or does publishing them serve a different role? And if they're bettable, are the lines locked in when you place the bet, or do they continue to flex?

From a novice: Can these numbers actually be bet on today, or does publishing them serve a different role? And if they're bettable, are the lines locked in when you place the bet, or do they continue to flex?

It is live betting. Locked in.

I don't get this, from Betonline.AG.

Oklahoma -11.5 vs. UCLA

Oklahoma -17 vs. Texas

Oklahoma -21 vs. TCU

The only one that makes any sense to me is the UCLA line.

OU has clearly had better teams than Texas for every year of the last five, yet has only gone 4-2 and has won those four by an average of 6.75 points.

This year, OU will be starting someone other than Baker Mayfield or Kyler Murray at QB, and will be starting at least four new offensive linemen.  Meanwhile, Texas is resurgent and figures to be better than last year, when the Horns won the regular-season game 48-45.

I don't get a 17-point spread.  Texas fans will surely bet that one down to single digits, I think.

Regarding TCU, Gary Patterson always has a good defense.  21 seems like about 7 points too much.

OTOH, UCLA figures to be terrible.  I wish we had never scheduled that series.  UCLA is supposed to be OU's "marquee" game.  But the opening game vs. Houston figures to be better.

OU opened at -11.5 vs Texas. It has been removed from the board. OU is still -11.5 at UCLA, and is now -15 vs. TCU.