Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

This is just denial.

It's not. There is no coherent argument that Biden is engaging in lawfare against Trump. 

he did incite a riot at the capitol

And tried to get his Veep to not accept the certification of the electoral vote.

And tried to send slates of fake electors to DC.

And tried to get the GA Sec of State to overturn Georgia's election results in his favor. 

And after nearly 4 years, still won't admit that he lost the election.

And when asked in the debate just a couple weeks ago, did not state that he'd accept the results of the next election if he loses. 

Hunter's case is obviously quite separate, and probably was forced by public attention.  I think any regular citizen might have been charged and then pled the case out, which happened there too until a judge wouldn't accept the plea.  Hunter is also up on tax charges as well.  Some folks claimed some of them were delayed until the statute of limitations ran out, I don't know for sure if that is a fact.

It is obviously possible to have Hunter being charged AND having Trump being charged and the latter being a case of "lawfare", one does not intersect with the other.  And Trump was convicted in state court of course, a separate entity.

Anyway, to me, it's all OPINION with very few supportive facts for either OPINION.

Hunter's case is obviously quite separate, and probably was forced by public attention.  I think any regular citizen might have been charged and then pled the case out, which happened there too until a judge wouldn't accept the plea.  Hunter is also up on tax charges as well.  Some folks claimed some of them were delayed until the statute of limitations ran out, I don't know for sure if that is a fact.

It is obviously possible to have Hunter being charged AND having Trump being charged and the latter being a case of "lawfare", one does not intersect with the other.  And Trump was convicted in state court of course, a separate entity.

Anyway, to me, it's all OPINION with very few supportive facts for either OPINION.

Well, like I said, no coherent argument to be made.

Joe Biden's son was charged and convicted by the same DOJ, in fact on charges that many think wouldn't have been brought but for the fact that Biden is his last name. So any argument about that needs to include the Hunter Biden stuff, and because the lawfare accusations are nonsense you get conspiracy theories.

Now that the laptop has been admitted into a Federal Court as evidence, we all know it's real, including the 51 asshats who penned a letter calling it a Russian hoax (a recurring theme).

Let's see what else is on it. They'd have had it for almost 4 years. Let's go already. "10 percent for the big guy" is of great interest.

Honestly, BRAD's point is probably correct. He is old and stumbles over his words and rambles, but that isn't dementia. He seems to know what is going on and be generally coherent.

Admittedly, I probably should have voted "maybe". My response was based on one debate, and I thought it might be an overreaction to a bad performance. More and more is coming out all the time, and it's looking worse and worse for Joe. 

That said, I stand by the other portion of what I said 100%. Even if he has the mental capacity to be President, he does NOT have the mental capacity to successfully run for President. 

MarqHusker usually knows what he's talkin bout