Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

Well, that would've REALLY pissed me off this year because Wisconsin had a stronger schedule.

Not sure about the quasi-helmet comment though. There is probably no such thing. You are or you're not, if you are not you can never be, based on what I've read here and elsewhere.

Yeah, but you're honestly telling me that if Wisconsin had a 31-pt loss to Iowa, like Ohio State did, you don't think the committee would justify Bama by excusing the top-10 Auburn loss and calling the Wisconsin loss to an unranked Iowa a "bad loss" that makes their resume weaker?
Wisconsin didn't climb into the top-4 in the CFP until week 14, and they were undefeated but still behind 1-loss Clemson and 1-loss Oklahoma, and 2-loss Auburn. 
They were getting NO respect as an undefeated team. If they'd been 11-1, I'm certain they'd be the last-ranked 1-loss P5 team and probably sitting behind 2-loss OSU and PSU. That would have put them around 9th. You think beating OSU in the CCG would have gotten them in over Bama? 

UCF athletic director Danny White said Wednesday the program has decided to claim a national championship and will place a championship banner inside Spectrum Stadium to recognize its undefeated 2017 season.

Let's not have 2 NFLs.

Let's have the most important regular season of any sport.  Please?

I've agreed with this for a while.Dragging out the season students miss more studies.Athletes risk more injury.Only one benefiting extended seasons are advertisers,networks and venues.Student athletes get more pocket change.4 game Playoff is just fine - win your games or don't complain

the committee would do what they do, we really would never know, but a one-loss 2nd place finisher in their division over a one-loss conference champ would be tough.  Even with a 31-point loss to Iowa

I think Big Jim Delany fights much harder for a spot in that case

4 loss Auburn is not a top 10 team. 

I am actually really excited about a 4 team playoff. I think it's the right amount.

THE LOWEST-RATED COLLEGE FOOTBALL TITLE GAMES

About a 3rd of the way down under the heading "That Fart Noise" It goes to show when non-conference champs that play for the title, America tunes out. 

I think if you can debate a conference champ vs. a non-champ that winning the title should be the tie breaker.

OSU had the same amount of wins as 'bama, had a tougher strength of schedule, had 4 victories better than anything 'bama played. OSU also had a 60 minute wtf moment, a 2nd loss, traditionally 'bama has been a great team, in Vegas 'bama would have been favored. Wow sounds like a pretty compelling debate, and in these situations I think conference champ should be selected.

8-5 Wisconsin should have no business in a playoff for getting 3rd in division, but still playing for title and upsetting Nebraska. 

Last year we could debate who more deserving between OSU and PSU (I know, I know committee said it was between Washington and Penn State, both conference champs) but we can still debate OSU / PSU. I'm of the opinion PSU won the conference they win the tie breaker.

Last year OSU was not clearly head and shoulders better than PSU. Put the conference champ in.
This year Alabama is not clearly head and shoulders better than OSU (or USC, or UCF.) Put the conference champ in.

I also don't want blowouts in the first round.  Clemson putting in its backups in the 3rd quarter, up 55-3 on the Sun Belt champ.  Just for fairness.

It's not about fairness, it's about earning your way in.  If a team loses a game, they also lose their right to complain.  If a team loses twice, they should be too embarrassed to complain.  But no, OSU fans are crying out about fairness this year....with 2 losses.