Yes.
I soak up those two weeks of mid-major conference tournaments. I'll watch random quarterfinal games online.
I didn't watch a minute of any of the Group of 5 CCGs other than UCF, because they were totally irrelevant.
To me, it's not national title or bust (which I'll elaborate on later, but don't have time now). I just want meaningful football. A CCG to determine who gets slaughtered by Clemson is still a hell of a lot more relevant than a CCG to determine a conference title, that doesn't really mean anything
To elaborate...
I think in expanding the postseason, they've grossly diminished the regular season, and not because there's more room for error in remaining in the top 4 vs. the top 2.
At least in my opinion, when only 2 got in, it was such an elite tier, that sole focus on reaching the championship game was too narrow to elicit the type of coverage the CFP gets now. The National Title was obviously the most important, but you lost too much audience focusing on it, that conference titles and bowl bids still remained important. You weren't in the national title hunt? Cool, you have a big conference title to go after. There were only 4 BCS bowls, so simply getting to one was also a big deal.
Going from 2 to 4 has only mildly expanded that group, but somehow it's enough that they now feel ok covering only that CFP race. Yet I believe Michigan State in 2015 was the only team to be ranked lower than #7 with 3 weeks to go, and still get in. So really, we have said, with 1/4 of the season to go, all but 7 teams are irrelevant. The entire Group of 5 is irrelevant from kickoff. The committee has also made clear that 2 losses, no matter to who, no matter what you subsequently win, is also fatal. So 3/4 of the FBS was irrelevant by the first game in October. College football has the best regular season? It has the highest stakes regular season to be sure, but with the singular focus on the CFP, it is now the only regular season that has rendered 75% of it's participants totally irrelevant by the start of the 2nd month of the season, and about 95% totally irrelevant with 1/4 of the season to play. Being in a NY6 bowl? Whoopee! I think the 4th place team in the Big Ten played in one last year. There is only played on like December 28.
So I've moved beyond the "greatest regular season" part, it's a farce. People love to discuss how there are too many bowl games, and they are all just exhibitions. I fail to see how they are any less of an exhibition than an early November game between #14 and #19. There is no rhyme or reason to bowl selection, and the threshold for getting eligible is laughably low. So those two teams aren't playing for bowl eligibility (which is just another exhibition anyway); they aren't playing for bowl positioning (which is totally random to create tv matchups); and they aren't playing for the only thing that matters, the CFP. At best, depending on their division, they may still be in the race to reach their CCG, but from that spot, all they can do there is give themselves a NY6 bowl, just like what UCF was playing for this year.
So I'm over pretending how great the regular season is. And I'm past trying to concern myself whether the "best" team in the national champion. Give me as much meaningful football as possible. A 12 team, 10 auto-bid playoff I think does that. You would have had the same teams as we had anyway, plus Auburn and 7 conference champs. You would have made all 10 conference races meaningful to the very end, adding dozens of meaningful games, and the only game you probably would have diminished is the SEC Championship Game, which still would have had some seeding impact.