header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Bowl Games SOC

 (Read 43598 times)

TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #826 on: January 08, 2019, 07:28:19 AM »
I know I know Cowherd is a blow hard, he is advocating for the CFB playoff to be smaller not bigger. He said all we needed this year was 'bama and Clemson. And then walked down the other top 10 teams. 3-5 all got crushed, Oklahoma was down 28-0. 7-10 all got crushed Washington was down 28-3. No one in the top ten had a reasonable chance against 'bama or Clemson. 

But wait Cowherd you left out one team in your dissection, lowly OSU. The team just a few weeks ago you were campaigning to be included in the playoff.  The team you were advocating was better than Notre Dame, and Oklahoma. 
The only team outside of 'bama and Clemson to win a game in the top 10. You can't just skip a team that doesn't fit your narrative. Or, well, I guess you can. 2 team playoff it is.

fezzador

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 576
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #827 on: January 08, 2019, 08:09:27 AM »
Cowherd is a troll that gets paid for it, pure and simple.  ESPN is a tabloid that happens to cover sports.

Can you imagine the outcry if FOX Sports (B1G Network's parent) hired a personality that perpetually looks down on the SEC as a bunch of stupid hayseeds who put winning ahead of morals?

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17150
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #828 on: January 08, 2019, 08:23:42 AM »
Can you imagine the outcry if FOX Sports (B1G Network's parent) hired a personality that perpetually looks down on the SEC as a bunch of stupid hayseeds who put winning ahead of morals?
Are you making reference to Gary Danielson?He really is the biggest shill/slappie/lap dog/yes man that I've ever,EVER heard or seen.It really is embarrassing if you're a Bama Fan unless you're as unglued as he is.Even PAWL isn't that much of a stumper


He proclaims every saturday in the fall how we are witness to return of Jesus and his disciples in the form of Alabama Football and how this is for all of man kind's benefit.Would you have some dignity already  Gary ,get off your knees and wipe Sabans cack off your chin.Apologies to any Tide Fans but waterboard the choad already
« Last Edit: January 08, 2019, 08:33:58 AM by MrNubbz »
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

fezzador

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 576
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #829 on: January 08, 2019, 08:30:12 AM »
The one and the same.  He needs to put down the Kool-Aid.

Funny thing is, my wife is a Bama grad and can't stand him.

Drew4UTk

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10165
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #830 on: January 08, 2019, 08:35:57 AM »
Danielson is the worst announcer in the business... he drips with bias, and doesn't even observe the on field action with any authority/insight... he parrots what officials say.  there are no redeeming qualities for that guy.... it's that bad... when i see him in the program as announcer, which is often being an SEC fan and CBS having the contract, I mute the idiot box and turn on pandora for some good tunes.... I'd rather just observe for myself. 

fezzador

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 576
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #831 on: January 08, 2019, 08:38:43 AM »
He makes Beth Mowins look watchable in comparison.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #832 on: January 08, 2019, 08:39:56 AM »
Joel Klatt is on his way there.  Danielson didn't used to be this.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #833 on: January 08, 2019, 08:50:04 AM »
Joel Klatt is on his way there.  Danielson didn't used to be this.
Not sure whether Joel Klatt is actually somewhat enlightened, or just posing as the anti-ESPN, but he at least expresses opinions that run counter to the grain.
I didn't get to watch much of the game but I can certainly say I'm surprised with the outcome.  Not that Alabama lost, I knew Clemson was good, but the manner in which they appear to have lost.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #834 on: January 08, 2019, 09:00:09 AM »
What will (or should) the final rankings be?

I don't realistically think that Ohio State can get into the top-4.  
Well color me shocked.  The Buckeyes are #3 in the final AP Poll behind Clemson and Bama.  The two CFP semi-final losers round out the top-5.  

As @OrangeAfroMan pointed out there is an odd lack of 2-loss teams so after 12-1 Notre Dame at #5 come three 3-loss SEC teams and then a 4-loss Texas at #9.  

The biggest mistake that jumps out to me is having WSU at #10 while Washington is all the way down at #13.  Washington has two more losses but the two extra losses were a tough OOC game (Auburn in Atlanta) and a tough bowl game against final #3 Ohio State.  By comparison the Cougars played a ridiculously easy OOC and got an easier bowl because of their loss to Washington.  Oh well.  

UCF is #11 which seems awfully high to me for a team whose only win over a ranked team came against #24.  
« Last Edit: January 08, 2019, 09:07:27 AM by medinabuckeye1 »

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17150
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #835 on: January 08, 2019, 09:36:12 AM »
Danielson is the worst announcer in the business... he drips with bias, and doesn't even observe the on field action with any authority/insight... he parrots what officials say.  there are no redeeming qualities for that guy.... it's that bad... when i see him in the program as announcer, which is often being an SEC fan and CBS having the contract, I mute the idiot box and turn on pandora for some good tunes.... I'd rather just observe for myself.
Evidently we have Jerry Springer enlightened Network Executives.Wouldn't you put someone in there that can tell or explain something to average fan that he may not have known.Or at least be creative and entertaining.GD is none of that,had I known the bar was so low I would have given it a shot myself
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

fezzador

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 576
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #836 on: January 08, 2019, 09:51:02 AM »
Joel Klatt is on his way there.  Danielson didn't used to be this.
My guess is that within 5 years, Klatt will either defect to ESPiN or CBS (presumably to take over Danielson when he retires).

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7851
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #837 on: January 08, 2019, 11:46:32 AM »
Evidently we have Jerry Springer enlightened Network Executives.Wouldn't you put someone in there that can tell or explain something to average fan that he may not have known.Or at least be creative and entertaining.GD is none of that,had I known the bar was so low I would have given it a shot myself
To a degree, we did this to ourselves.
We pay attention to things that anger us. Most broadcasts are deeply mundane, but we just have an ear for what pisses us off. Typhonic picked out the OSU snub by Cowherd, even through he knows Cowherd is a pointless clown.
As shoot, that post up higher, that was GRAPHIC. Just right out there. And for what? A dude who calls one game a week, probably not one you watch on a regular basis, but just his aura causes us to say all sorts of over the top things. We're not good at saying what we like, but we are good at feeling strongly about what we don't.
(That said, I'm of two minds about the TV execs. On one, they replaced the coach's film room, the best part of the megacast, with the MNF crew. That was bad, though not as bad as I expected, as Whitten was oddly solid and Booger had some moments. Granted, still bad. They did have the all-22/sky cam/high sky cam options, which I found to be good on all fronts)

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1243
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #838 on: January 08, 2019, 12:10:10 PM »
So will this result affect whether the committee will allow Bama in the playoffs in the future
I'll be more explicit: all those saying a blowout in a single game is reason that a team didn't belong in the first place would thus need to explain why Alabama didn't belong. Hard to justify that. Just as Notre Dame's closer loss to Clemson -- by a point :-)  --  doesn't mean it didn't belong. I said all year that Clemson didn't convince me it was one of the top two, but it turns out Clemson was awfully good when it mattered. Alabama had me convinced...until it mattered. What if the SEC wasn't as good at the top as "everyone" thinks. Or more likely, what if college football is actually pretty darned competitive at the top--across all the major conferences, and some times the ball starts rolling one way and doesn't stop.
Final(?) thought:
Rankings remain beauty contests. Football is won and lost on the field.

Post Final Thought: "ENTERTAINMENT & Sports Programming Network." Don't kid yourself into thinking ESPN is a news organization. :-)

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #839 on: January 08, 2019, 12:41:54 PM »
Well color me shocked.  The Buckeyes are #3 in the final AP Poll behind Clemson and Bama.  The two CFP semi-final losers round out the top-5.  

As @OrangeAfroMan pointed out there is an odd lack of 2-loss teams so after 12-1 Notre Dame at #5 come three 3-loss SEC teams and then a 4-loss Texas at #9.  

The biggest mistake that jumps out to me is having WSU at #10 while Washington is all the way down at #13.  Washington has two more losses but the two extra losses were a tough OOC game (Auburn in Atlanta) and a tough bowl game against final #3 Ohio State.  By comparison the Cougars played a ridiculously easy OOC and got an easier bowl because of their loss to Washington.  Oh well.  

UCF is #11 which seems awfully high to me for a team whose only win over a ranked team came against #24.  
Is #9 the highest ever for a 4 loss team?

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.