header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure

 (Read 201 times)

ManHawk

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 188
  • Text
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #28 on: Today at 01:47:12 PM »
I would prefer an alternative version of history where:

Nebraska joins the Big Ten the same year as Penn St did, 1993.  Big12 forms 3 years early and adds BYU as Nebraska's replacement.

Then change the CCG game rules in 1993 so that you don't need divisions to have a CCG,.  You only need at least 12 teams total.  So the BigTen, Big12, SEC,ACC and Pac all eventually have 12 teams and CCGs with no divisions.  

Then move up the start of the BCS to 1993 so that the 2 best teams are always playing for the national championship.


We are all equal but some are more equal than others.

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2402
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #29 on: Today at 02:49:37 PM »
9 conference games, 3 ooc games.  No CCG.

Perfection.
This.

The other part of this post gets in the way, because, I, too, like the 11-team Big Ten of the mid-90s. I liked the Big 12, too--with Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and aTm all in the same place.

But if I were starting from scratch, I would go with 10-team conferences (and promotion/relegation to allow the non-power conference teams a chance to get into a power conference to compete for the major championship).

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25092
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #30 on: Today at 02:53:34 PM »
Oh geez here come the soccer dorks with their promotion/relegation ideas. :57:

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2402
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #31 on: Today at 03:06:12 PM »
Damn right.

You think Luke Fickell would get another year if Wisconsin was staring at joining the MAC, while Ohio was set to take the Badgers' place in the Big Ten? This ain't AFC Richmond and he ain't Ted Lasso
« Last Edit: Today at 03:19:15 PM by SFBadger96 »

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5374
  • Liked:
Re: Your Ideal Individual Season Structure
« Reply #32 on: Today at 04:09:30 PM »
This.

The other part of this post gets in the way, because, I, too, like the 11-team Big Ten of the mid-90s. I liked the Big 12, too--with Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, and aTm all in the same place.

But if I were starting from scratch, I would go with 10-team conferences (and promotion/relegation to allow the non-power conference teams a chance to get into a power conference to compete for the major championship).


You had me until "relegation."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.