header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Big Ten Expansion

 (Read 2865 times)

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8958
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #84 on: April 08, 2024, 10:39:12 AM »
It's also a choice how to fly.

You know why CD always talks about getting upgraded to first class? Because not enough first class tickets are sold. A plane maybe has 15-20 first class seats, and it's rare that they're all sold for first class prices. Loyalty members and frequent fliers end up there as a "perk".

You know why airlines are at a race to the bottom for ticket costs, scrapping anything that makes customers comfortable? Because every fare is available on the internet, easily comparable, and consumers will buy the cheapest fare even if it means flying a no-frills airline. I'm convinced some consumers would sit out on the wing if they could save $10.

You know why nobody that's not rich (and despite your pleas, most on this site aren't "rich") does what you suggest and makes use of the option that you don't have to show up hours early--which exists and is called flying private? Because it's damned expensive, that's why. There are all sorts of options out there where you can book these flights, but very few people can afford it.

Simply put, if bigger seats i.e. "make the whole plane first class" was something mainstream consumers would pay for, there would be at least ONE airline doing it. But we're not willing to pay for it.

Flying sucks, because all we're willing to pay for is a great big Greyhound in the sky. Flying sucks because we, as consumers, chose low price over  high quality.

That's what I mean when I say you don't understand economics or consumer behavior. We got where we are re: flying because it was driven by what consumers wanted--low price. "Make the whole plane first class" is something consumers SAY we want, but then we pick the flight based on price, and bitch about why the airline experience is so shitty.

 @OrangeAfroMan , economists refer to what @betarhoalphadelta described here as "revealed preference".  It is a topic that economists spend a great deal of time researching and studying because it screws with their models.  An example (I'm making this up but I would guess it is close to true):
  • Conduct a poll, 90% of fliers say they'd pay $10 for a bigger seat.
  • Actually redesign the plane to offer bigger seats and offer them for fares of $10 higher than the normal and . . . nobody buys tickets.  
#1 is what people say they want but #2 is what they ACTUALLY want - their revealed preference.  This happens all the time, not just with flying.  When polled people think "sure I'd pay $10 for a bigger seat" and they aren't really "lying", in that moment they REALLY believe that they would but then when push comes to shove and they go to google flights to find flights for their next trip what they actually do is click "sort by price" and pick the cheapest or at least the cheapest that is not too ridiculously inconvenient to their schedule.  

The economics of airfare in general is fascinating.  More than almost any other industry, the marginal costs (cost to add one more unit - in this case passenger) are usually effectively zero.  Ie, if an airline has a plane flying from LA to Phoenix this afternoon, so long as not all the seats are sold, the cost to the airline of putting Beta's butt in one of their empty seats to fly him to Phoenix for Purdue's triumphant National Championship is effectively almost zero.  Fundamentally this is why the airlines offer standby fares for REALLY cheap, because if they have extra seats on a plane basically anything they get for those seats is a net positive for the airline.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25669
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #85 on: April 08, 2024, 10:46:19 AM »
We like flying (on American) because we get perks because of our status. Free premium economy (more leg room) seats, no baggage fees, free cocktails, free upgrades to first/business, priority check-in, and priority baggage (ours come out first).

We do pay more (unless using points) to fly on American than Southwest or whatever. We're OK with that because we worked very hard to have that choice and not have to choose Spirit, Frontier, etc.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12367
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #86 on: April 08, 2024, 11:33:18 AM »
We like flying (on American) because we get perks because of our status. Free premium economy (more leg room) seats, no baggage fees, free cocktails, free upgrades to first/business, priority check-in, and priority baggage (ours come out first).

We do pay more (unless using points) to fly on American than Southwest or whatever. We're OK with that because we worked very hard to have that choice and not have to choose Spirit, Frontier, etc.
Yeah, and expanding on what @medinabuckeye1 said, the economics that get involved in loyalty programs get interesting. I basically try to fly American or Southwest if I can. American is where all my frequent flyer mileage usually went back when I was regularly traveling for work, and I'd try to work my schedule to maintain status. Even now, one advantage to American for personal flying is that although I don't rack up enough miles to get status, my AAdvantage credit card gets me free checked bags and priority boarding. Southwest I fly frequently from here because it's cheap and easy--and no checked bag fees for that either. 

But while I tell OAM that people like us aren't "rich", I think we're well off enough that we can make those choices, especially since we fly often enough (for business or pleasure) that those little perks can add up. We do take non-monetary aspects into consideration, not just price. But price still matters. I might pay a little more to fly American than, say, United or Delta, but there's a limit. I also won't fly American if there's no direct non-stop flight, but United or Delta has a direct flight (perhaps due to the destination being a United/Delta hub). Price/routing are still important, and they trump loyalty programs for me. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25669
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #87 on: April 08, 2024, 11:41:36 AM »
You are fortunate to have hubs nearby, so flying direct is easy. The only direct flights we can get is if we are flying to certain hubs.

Seems like every other place we go, they put us through Charlotte, Dallas or Chicago.

We use our AA card for everything. Literally everything.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12367
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #88 on: April 08, 2024, 12:08:44 PM »
You are fortunate to have hubs nearby, so flying direct is easy. The only direct flights we can get is if we are flying to certain hubs.

Seems like every other place we go, they put us through Charlotte, Dallas or Chicago.

We use our AA card for everything. Literally everything.
Honestly, I really try to avoid LAX if I can. LAX has much more direct flights than Orange County and typically better pricing, but I won't drive there unless I really have to. I will often look at San Diego rather than LAX because I'd rather drive there than LAX. It's slightly farther away, but I hate LAX so much that I will accept that if the price/routing/etc works.

The number of direct flights out of SNA isn't that great except to certain destinations. A lot of the western states can be direct on Southwest, but any time I'm headed east on American to anywhere except Chicago (where I don't go much now that my parents moved to CO) or Dallas (where I have almost no reason to go) I'm pretty much routed through one of those two most of the time. 

For Indy we flew out of SNA, and neither trip was direct. It was on Southwest through LAS on the outbound trip, and on American through PHX on the return. That was the best price/routing combo I could find. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25669
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #89 on: April 08, 2024, 12:13:13 PM »
We are flying to Chicago a lot coming up.

May 1
July 2
September 2
October 4
October 25
November 15
December 25

In between all of that, we have a ton of visitors lined up in October, November and December.

We have to go to PHX in early December for my MIL's 90th birthday. Trying to figure out that trip. PHX is not a hub for AA.

I'm going to be tired in January. No Cabo this year, that's for sure.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37927
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #90 on: April 08, 2024, 01:39:33 PM »
I'm tired just thinking about that
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8958
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #91 on: April 08, 2024, 02:55:18 PM »
Flying is fine.  I just have 2 gripes. 
Having to show up early negates much of the advantage.
On this I agree with you completely and I think people tend to undervalue this time. ORD is 5-1/2 hours from me driving. A direct flight takes about 1-1/2 hours . . . in the air. I think people tend to oversimplify that and just say that flying saves four hours but if I flew to Chicago I'd have to leave my house about two hours before takeoff and it would probably take me the better part of an hour to get off the plane, retrieve my luggage, get a rental car, and get out of the airport parking maze. So the fair comparison isn't 5.5-1.5=4 hours saved, it is more like 5.5-4.5=1 hour saved. 

Then on top of that if I fly there are a lot of options for flight times but it isn't infinitely flexible like driving. I can't just leave a little early or a little late. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25669
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #92 on: April 08, 2024, 03:22:54 PM »
When I go to ORD, I'm in my rental car and on the road in 30-40 minutes, tops. 
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8958
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #93 on: April 08, 2024, 03:43:24 PM »
When I go to ORD, I'm in my rental car and on the road in 30-40 minutes, tops.
Well, that (barely) meets the definition of:
the better part of an hour
On top of that, since you lived and worked in Chicago for many years I'm assuming you've flown to ORD a LOT more than I have (once). It would take me longer due to my lack of familiarity. 

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12367
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #94 on: April 08, 2024, 03:44:15 PM »
When I go to ORD, I'm in my rental car and on the road in 30-40 minutes, tops.
When I travel alone, that's usually my case. When I travel with my wife, we check bags so that doesn't work so quickly. 

I will say one thing I hate about the Orange County airport is how painfully slow they send out the bags. For such a small and simple airport, I don't understand what takes so long... 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25669
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #95 on: April 08, 2024, 03:53:37 PM »
That's why I like priority baggage tags. By the time we get from the gate to baggage at ORD, our bags are there, we hop on the tram, and go right to our rental car (no counter stops for us - Hertz Gold).
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12367
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #96 on: April 08, 2024, 04:07:30 PM »
That's why I like priority baggage tags. By the time we get from the gate to baggage at ORD, our bags are there, we hop on the tram, and go right to our rental car (no counter stops for us - Hertz Gold).
Ahh. I don't fly frequently enough to maintain status any longer, so that's been out. I'm not one of the million mile club lol. Only about a third of the way there. 

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18964
  • Liked:
Re: Big Ten Expansion
« Reply #97 on: April 08, 2024, 09:51:49 PM »
It's also a choice how to fly.

You know why CD always talks about getting upgraded to first class? Because not enough first class tickets are sold. A plane maybe has 15-20 first class seats, and it's rare that they're all sold for first class prices. Loyalty members and frequent fliers end up there as a "perk".

You know why airlines are at a race to the bottom for ticket costs, scrapping anything that makes customers comfortable? Because every fare is available on the internet, easily comparable, and consumers will buy the cheapest fare even if it means flying a no-frills airline. I'm convinced some consumers would sit out on the wing if they could save $10.

You know why nobody that's not rich (and despite your pleas, most on this site aren't "rich") does what you suggest and makes use of the option that you don't have to show up hours early--which exists and is called flying private? Because it's damned expensive, that's why. There are all sorts of options out there where you can book these flights, but very few people can afford it.

Simply put, if bigger seats i.e. "make the whole plane first class" was something mainstream consumers would pay for, there would be at least ONE airline doing it. But we're not willing to pay for it.

Flying sucks, because all we're willing to pay for is a great big Greyhound in the sky. Flying sucks because we, as consumers, chose low price over  high quality.

That's what I mean when I say you don't understand economics or consumer behavior. We got where we are re: flying because it was driven by what consumers wanted--low price. "Make the whole plane first class" is something consumers SAY we want, but then we pick the flight based on price, and bitch about why the airline experience is so shitty.
Yes, people chose low price because that's all they can afford.  
Don't to a bullshit +$10 for first class example, because this isn't about a few bucks for a better experience.  I just looked up the same dates on a travel site for economy vs first class and you're spending 4x as much for a slightly larger seat.

If the airlines' margins are so shitty, then perhaps we shouldn't have widespread air travel.  Flights can be similar to safe neighborhoods or green grass and manicured roadways - perks for the wealthy.

The more people say they're not rich here, the less I believe it.  Maybe I should specify upper class, so that nobody's panties get in a pinch.  To argue against it is odd and dishonest.  Cruises, fights, trips, weeks in Europe, etc. aren't even feasible for most people.  The argument against my claim SHOULD be "we're old farts at our wealthiest point of our lives" and obviously not "we're not rich."  

Just be accurate, man.

Now, go poll potential flyers and ask them if they'd pay over 4x the cost of a ticket onto the plane to have a seat 3-4 inches wider.  
No, that's not worth it for 99% of people.  Duh.  

For most, being packed in like sardines is their only option.  The other potential option is simply not flying.  That's the fancy-pants economic explanation.  Do not pretend otherwise.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.