header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: B1G Power Rankings, preseason

 (Read 3793 times)

LittlePig

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2021, 12:01:19 PM »
1. OSU
Until they actually lose, OSU always gets the benefit of the doubt

2.  Indy
Returning a good QB and good defense.

3.  Iowa
Iowa won their last 6 games of the season in 2020, including solid victories over PSU and Wiscy.  Iowa's defense has been under-rated the last couple years. 

4.  Wisc
Wisconsin rarely goes 2 years in a row without a division title.

5.  PSU
PSU won their last 4 games in 2020 after starting 0-5.  But did not really beat anybody that was any good.

6. NW
If NW tries to repeat its division titles in 2018 and 2020, it will have to do it with defense.  NW has lost some key people but I want to give them some respect for what they have accomplished recently.

7.  Minn
Still has a pretty good QB

8.  Neb
If Frost is going to turn this around, this is the year he needs to do it.

9.  Rut
Rutgers was competitive in almost every game last year, A big improvement.

10.  MD
Never really had a chance to get any momentum going in 2020.  May have the worst head coach in the Big Ten

11.  Pur
Got off to a 2-0 start, then absolutely fell apart in 2020.  Has potential to be a surprise team that comes out of nowhere to win the West.

12.  MICH
Michigan had a big blow out win against Minny in the opening game of 2020, but was just simply bad the rest of the year.  Its only other win in 2020 was a 3OT game against Rutgers.  Mich may come back strong this year but they no longer get the benefit of the doubt in my mind.

13.  MSU
Team has potential and could surprise,  but for now, they need to prove it first.

14.  ILL
Only because they have a new coach taking over and it will take time to improve.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2021, 12:34:13 PM »
5.  PSU
PSU won their last 4 games in 2020 after starting 0-5.  But did not really beat anybody that was any good.
Speaking just for myself, I think the Nittany Lions will bounce back quickly.  Last year was goofy with the pandemic and they just seemed unlucky last year.  Those five losses:
  • Indiana:  They outgained IU 488-211 but gave up a 2pt conversion in OT and lost by one point.  
  • Ohio State:  They played a solid game against Ohio State being within one score in the third quarter and remember that Ohio State finished as national runner-up so this isn't a loss to be embarrassed about.  
  • Maryland:  It may be cliche but I think they simply let the Buckeyes beat them twice.  
  • Nebraska:  I really don't know how to explain this one, maybe they were just demoralized with their 0-3 start?
  • Iowa:  They had about as many yards as the Hawkeyes but turned the ball over FOUR times and well, that usually isn't conducive to winning football games.  


They outgained their opponent in three of the five losses (IU, UMD, UNL) and they were close against Iowa.  I think 2020 PSU was just plain unlucky.  

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2021, 12:41:15 PM »
6. Rutgers

14. Minnesota
:a102:
  • 8 Rutgers - because they are trending upwards, while the teams beneath them aren't.
  • 11 Minnesota - Eh, I dunno which way they are rowing these days.
What are you two guys seeing that the rest of us aren't?  

You two have Rutgers at #6 and #8 while the rest of us have them at #9, #10, #12 (2x) and #13 (3x).  

You two have Minnesota at #14 and #11 while the rest of us have them at #9, #8, #7 (2x), #6 (2x) and #5.  

I don't mean this to be argumentative so please don't take it that way.  This is a preseason poll so who knows but on these two teams your votes are major outliers and I'm just asking what you are seeing to make you think that?  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2021, 12:43:19 PM »
it's natural to look back at last season's performance, but it was a COVID season
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2021, 12:58:12 PM »
4.  Wisc
Wisconsin rarely goes 2 years in a row without a division title.
Since the inception of the B1GCG, there have never been consecutive B1GCG's without Wisconsin.  They made it in 2011, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2019 while missing in 2013, 2015, 2018, and 2020.  

What is ironic is that they actually have gone two years without a division title (2012-2013) but they went to the B1GCG in 2012 as the third place team.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #19 on: August 18, 2021, 01:00:34 PM »
yup, that sucked
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11238
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #20 on: August 18, 2021, 01:02:26 PM »
:a102:What are you two guys seeing that the rest of us aren't? 

You two have Rutgers at #6 and #8 while the rest of us have them at #9, #10, #12 (2x) and #13 (3x). 

You two have Minnesota at #14 and #11 while the rest of us have them at #9, #8, #7 (2x), #6 (2x) and #5. 

I don't mean this to be argumentative so please don't take it that way.  This is a preseason poll so who knows but on these two teams your votes are major outliers and I'm just asking what you are seeing to make you think that? 


I mean everyone is in agreement that it is a total crap shoot after #1 including yourself. Even your "reasoning" for each team was based on your whims instead of your usual analytical/data based explanations. 

There is no logical reason for our "whims" to be in sync, unless we are intentionally (or unintentionally) influenced by each other's rankings. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Abba

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 995
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #21 on: August 18, 2021, 01:19:22 PM »
Pretty much true.  There is a lot of volatility this year due to the mess that was 2020.  We all have to make decisions about some teams actually being good (Indiana?) and others that were just bad because of Covid disruptions (Minnesota, PSU, Michigan?).  It's going to definitely lead to some variance in our choices.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12188
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2021, 01:19:47 PM »

I mean everyone is in agreement that it is a total crap shoot after #1 including yourself. Even your "reasoning" for each team was based on your whims instead of your usual analytical/data based explanations.

There is no logical reason for our "whims" to be in sync, unless we are intentionally (or unintentionally) influenced by each other's rankings.
Agreed, but I think what medina was asking is what whims drove that decision? 

Is there something that you see that makes you think Rutgers is going to be significantly improved this year? Is there something that you see that makes you think Minnesota will take a significant step back?

I think the goal here is not to chastise you for a different ranking, but to better understand what drove your rankings in case you're seeing something that others missed.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71548
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2021, 01:21:45 PM »
Most have given up on Michigan, but they have some talent right?  Are they the second most talented squad in the conference?

Maybe this is the year they do better than expected?

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2021, 01:24:32 PM »
they do better than expected or Jimmy could be out
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Abba

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 995
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #25 on: August 18, 2021, 01:31:26 PM »
Yes, Michigan has the 2nd best talent.  But outside of the nice opener against Minnesota, they looked pretty rough last year.  It wasn't a case of bad breaks like with Penn State, they were thoroughly outplayed most games, including being very lucky to get their win against Rutgers.  I wouldn't be shocked if they bounce back, but I would lean more towards a 3rd or 4th place finish in the East.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11238
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #26 on: August 18, 2021, 01:36:33 PM »
Agreed, but I think what medina was asking is what whims drove that decision?

Is there something that you see that makes you think Rutgers is going to be significantly improved this year? Is there something that you see that makes you think Minnesota will take a significant step back?

I think the goal here is not to chastise you for a different ranking, but to better understand what drove your rankings in case you're seeing something that others missed.


They exceeded expectations last year and, while I am not exactly a recruiting buff, I was hearing up until about a month ago that they had like a top ten class going. 

I don't think that they are going to be a Top 25 caliber team by any stretch, but we are talking about a Conference where 11 teams were worse than Indiana and Northwestern. Pretty much everyone here has Indiana and Northwestern taking a massive step back, so it's not like they finished 2nd and 3rd last year because they are loaded up with NFL talent or anything like that. It's a low bar to clear. 



1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Benthere2

  • Player
  • ****
  • Posts: 754
  • Liked:
Re: B1G Power Rankings, preseason
« Reply #27 on: August 18, 2021, 02:29:28 PM »
:a102:What are you two guys seeing that the rest of us aren't? 

You two have Rutgers at #6 and #8 while the rest of us have them at #9, #10, #12 (2x) and #13 (3x). 

You two have Minnesota at #14 and #11 while the rest of us have them at #9, #8, #7 (2x), #6 (2x) and #5. 

I don't mean this to be argumentative so please don't take it that way.  This is a preseason poll so who knows but on these two teams your votes are major outliers and I'm just asking what you are seeing to make you think that
badger fans just hating Minnesota  

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.