Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

If the league goes to a divisonless CG structure, THE GAME has to be moved off of the final weekend.  

I know this is not a popular argument around here but this year makes a great example so I'm going to use it.  If we had a divisonless structure, here would be the top of the standings heading into THE GAME:

• 8-0 Michigan
• 8-0 Ohio State
• 6-2 Penn State (lost to tOSU and M)
• 5-3 Iowa (lost to tOSU, M, and IL)
• 5-3 Purdue (lost to PSU, UW,  and IA)

Ohio State and Michigan would have already clinched.  Actually, both would have clinched before last week's games because neither Maryland (3-4 heading in) nor Illinois (4-3 heading in) could have caught either so the only team that could have would have been PSU which both already defeated.  

Why I think you can't have tOSU/M the week before a divisonless CG / Imagine that we had a divisonless CG this year:
Assume for a minute that you are Jim Harbaugh or Ryan Day.  You are presented with two consecutive games against the other.  From a fan perspective we want to win both, of course but from Day/Harbaugh's perspective the second one matters and the first one doesn't.  This will be even more true when we go to a 12-team CFP with the top-4 league champs getting a bye.  The winner of the SECOND tOSU/M game gets a bye.  The winner of the first . . . gets to play in the second.  The second game gets you a bye.  The first game might potentially matter a little bit for seeding, maybe.  Oh, winning the first also gets you bragging rights . . . for a week.  

If this was the situation this year then none of the banged up players would play this week because it would be MUCH more sensible to let them rest and recover and get them back for the game that matters, the second tOSU/M game.  On top of that, from a game-planning perspective there would be no reason to utilize (and thus give away) any advantage you thought you had discovered in game #1, it would make MUCH more sense to keep those cards in your hand and just basically play a vanilla gameplan with half your starters out in game #1.  

I think it would have to be moved to October, probably mid-month. Otherwise it's a disaster waiting to happen.

Michigan can play Sparty the week prior, and OSU can play Wisconsin.

Move UW and Minnie back to October like it should be.

Michigan can play Sparty the week prior, and OSU can play Wisconsin.

I like this - ANNUALLY of course

ANALLY?
.
Scheduled rematches are the dumbest dumb.  

there's certainly great significance this season

I believe many have made the argument that the significance of Michigan and Ohio State playing on the final game of the regular season has been greatly diminished for the following reasons.

The Game used to be the week before Thanksgiving so many of the game-week traditions were done while students were still on campus.  When The Game and other Big Ten rival games were moved to the Saturday after Thanksgiving, that screwed up rival week for a lot of rival games.

The Game is not really the final game or the only important game of the season anymore for OSU or Mich.  Now the CCG and bowls and CFP are other important games that still need to be played after The Game.

And it was the last you saw your team for like 6 weeks, in a bowl game.  And if you lost, maybe not even then.  Now, you hope to have 3 more games, and soon 4.  It's not really the "end" of the season anymore.  You could potentially still have a quarter of your season left

Agreed.

The problem is if you put UM/OSU in one division, that will be the hardest.

what's the problem?
I don't see the problem with this season
So, one division is stronger than the other.  That's almost always going to be the case

put the beach boys in the west and hope they can bring some competition

hope Wisconsin and Nebraska rise again