Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

If fan-service is important, consider this for LSU. 

Keep Hodson, take out Russell.  Hodson is still adored, and probably rightly so.  Russell, despite how good he became, never shook off his reputation with fans for being late over the middle.  Also, Hodson keeps a nice "career-guy" balance with the "brief burning star" guys in Burrow and Daniels.  

You could go:  Burrow, Daniels, Hodson, Jones.  

I figured it was "A", just wondered

I don't feel like I'm being stubborn and insisting on old-school guys for no reason.  I just value an array of eras when it comes to all-time teams.  

As for my customers, I feel like part of the reason they buy my game (unrelated to all-time teams) is that I offer teams going way back.  Many, obviously, buy teams they remember from their personal sweet spot of watching and loving college football.  This seems to range from the late-60s to the early-80s.  It just makes sense that they'd value a good QB from back then compared to a guy in the 2010s who had over twice the pass attempts while never throwing the ball more than 15 yards downfield.

But it is quite amazing how bad passing attacks were, all the way up into the 1990s.

Thank god for BYU, Miami, and Spurrier, because jesus christ......the rest of the country SUCKED at passing.  

I suppose that is the reason teams that didn't prioritize passing were doing most of the winning all the way up 2000

1983
1984
1987
1989
1991
1993
1996
1999
I think it's more like "I played under so-and-so, and he didn't like passing" + "I don't like passing and I have an .800 winning percentage" + "If it ain't broke, why fix it?"
aka
a mix of tradition, success, and laziness