header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 923874 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90044
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5670 on: June 12, 2026, 09:56:51 AM »
I thought it meant you’d have to take two acres and return to their native state if you use one of swampland.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 36297
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5671 on: June 12, 2026, 10:33:58 AM »
I thought it meant you’d have to take two acres and return to their native state if you use one of swampland.
Correct. It's called mitigation in the case of wetlands. The level of mitigation can range from 1:1 to 3:1, based on the quality of the existing wetland. Most of the wetlands down here are extremely high quality.

In the case of floodplain, it's called compensatory storage. Comp storage must be provided at the hydraulic/elevation equivalent. That is NOT easy and it eats up a lot of land.

Wetland mitigation is further complicated by the fact that the developer must be responsible for establishment and maintenance for 5-7 years. If it fails, and they often do, it's on the developer to redo it.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 36297
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5672 on: June 12, 2026, 10:34:20 AM »

I don't know what this means.  Can you explain more? 

It sounds like you're saying if somebody buys 3 acres to develop, they can actually do something with 1 and have to leave the other 2.  Is it like how in CenTex in the Edwards Aquifer recharge zones, people are only allowed to build on 25% of any purchased property? 
See above.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 54751
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5673 on: June 12, 2026, 11:05:27 PM »
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90044
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5674 on: June 14, 2026, 09:30:35 AM »
It's not a terrible list, IMHO.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 54751
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5675 on: June 14, 2026, 09:43:56 AM »
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 27076
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5676 on: June 14, 2026, 12:07:42 PM »
1995 Nebraska, 2005 Texas,and then all the rest.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90044
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5677 on: June 14, 2026, 12:16:36 PM »
A fun list would be the ten worst AP champions, I guess BYU would be favored in that one.

It's pretty much opinion, and interesting how the AI things have differences.  

I've always held '95 Nebraska as being off on their own island.  Their closest win was not very close.


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 36297
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5678 on: June 14, 2026, 12:21:02 PM »
A fun list would be the ten worst AP champions, I guess BYU would be favored in that one.

It's pretty much opinion, and interesting how the AI things have differences. 

I've always held '95 Nebraska as being off on their own island.  Their closest win was not very close.


A lot of Goopher teams raise their hands.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90044
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5679 on: June 14, 2026, 12:25:03 PM »
Worst to finish #1

[th]Year[/th]
[th]School[/th]
[th]W[/th]
[th]L[/th]
[th]T[/th]
[th]SRS[/th]
[th]SOS[/th]
[th]AP Post[/th]
1984BYU130014.68-1.631
1957Auburn100017.633.331
2002Ohio State140018.133.991
2007LSU122018.415.771
1992Alabama130018.972.741
1950Oklahoma101019.214.761
1990Colorado111119.459.061
1980Georgia120019.485.641
2006Florida131019.666.951


 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.