header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread

 (Read 31047 times)

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11932
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1008 on: March 12, 2026, 10:26:10 PM »
I'm sorry, but I had to laugh at that. Again, the numbers don't lie. Undefeated regular seasons are rare. It's special to see one! Of course it is emotional. Sports are emotional. No one watches sports and because they need to put in numbers in a spreadsheet (except perhaps Purdue grads).

But again, the math is against you. To get around the FACT that NONE of the bubble teams would likely had the same regular season record against Miami's schedule, you have to cherry pick the games.

To get around the FACT that Miami's regular season was special, you have to pretend that it happens all the time.

The math here is one sided. How many teams have accomplished something that Miami did? I'm not going to do the equation, but less than .00001 percent? Compared to Auburn, which needed an overtime victory over #224th ranked Bethune-Cookman just to have a winning record. But I'm sure their NERD is better, so losing half their games is just fine.
If you are laughing it is only because you aren't smart enough to understand the difference between data and opinion.  

I just listed four bubble teams that went 54-0 against Q3/4 opponents and Miami FAILED to win all of their Q3/4 games.  Facts not opinions.  

You just said that "the bubble teams likely . . ."  Opinion not fact.  

You said I cherry picked.  Nope, I used the NCAA's NET categories.  Facts not opinions.  

Miami's undefeated regular season was special FOR THEM just like a High School team's undefeated regular season would be special FOR THEM.  Neither of those things justify inclusion in the NCAA DI Tournament.  

I'm not pretending that undefeated regular seasons happen all the time, I just don't care and I am also acknowledging the FACT that they did it against a bunch of crappy opponents.  Facts not opinions.  

Try using facts instead of opinions and you'll see that your argument falls short.  

bayareabadger

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10169
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1009 on: March 12, 2026, 10:31:46 PM »
On this I completely agree and I even said upthread that:I think your statement about a real cruddy bottom of the bubble is functionally the same thing as mine that I'd vote to include them if it was close.  Yeah, if the bubble is so incredibly weak that there is a plausible data-driven argument for including Miami legitimately then I'd probably let the emotional argument carry the day and include them over a similarly bad team that didn't have that on their side. 

The problem for Miami is that it just isn't close.  The data unequivocally says no.  There is no plausible data-driven argument for including them so they are left with ONLY the emotional argument. 

They entered the day 21st in SOR, so we'll see if that holds. They are 35th in WAB. A bit low at 47th in KPI. 

So the resume metrics are helping them for the moment, providing a plausible data-driven argument. Who know if it'll hold, but turns out it's there. If they were just dead on those, there wouldn't be much of a discussion, but for now there is. Suppose we'll see.

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11932
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1010 on: March 12, 2026, 10:33:51 PM »
See, that's where I got that.
I said teams with a pulse, you adjusted that to:
Reached out to close to 20 power conference schools. 
Not all "teams with a pulse" are power conference schools.  I don't know (and see above, I don't really care) but did they reach out to decent mid-majors?  

Their OOC consisted of complete and total crap.  They played not one but two schools that are so insignificant that I've never heard of them and ESPN doesn't even have a link for them (Trinity Christian and Indiana University East).  There are plenty of "teams with a pulse" between Trinity Christian and the "power conference schools".  I'm not saying that I wouldn't include them unless they played Duke, just that being literally 0-fer the season in Q1 and only 2-0 in Q2 is a BIG problem for me when the math unequivocally says no.  

MaximumSam

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 523
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1011 on: March 12, 2026, 10:34:40 PM »


You just said that "the bubble teams likely . . ."  Opinion not fact. 

No. This is false. It has nothing to do with opinion. Based on their fancystats you can calculate the chance each team would beat another team. You can then calculate how likely it is a team would go undefeated against any schedule, including Miami's. None of the bubble teams are likely to go undefeated against Miami's schedule.

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11932
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1012 on: March 12, 2026, 10:36:31 PM »
They entered the day 21st in SOR, so we'll see if that holds. They are 35th in WAB. A bit low at 47th in KPI.

So the resume metrics are helping them for the moment, providing a plausible data-driven argument. Who know if it'll hold, but turns out it's there. If they were just dead on those, there wouldn't be much of a discussion, but for now there is. Suppose we'll see.
I'm operating on the assumption that those, along with their NET, KenPom, and Torvik rankings will plummet on the basis of a neutral court loss to a 200+ ranked opponent.  

Honestly, do ANY of the bubble teams have a loss as bad as losing a neutral court game to UMASS?  I assume a few of them might but I'm not sure.  

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11932
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1013 on: March 12, 2026, 10:37:17 PM »
No. This is false. It has nothing to do with opinion. Based on their fancystats you can calculate the chance each team would beat another team. You can then calculate how likely it is a team would go undefeated against any schedule, including Miami's. None of the bubble teams are likely to go undefeated against Miami's schedule.
Neither did Miami which is why this is a discussion.  If they HAD gone undefeated then they'd get an auto-bid.  

MaximumSam

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 523
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1014 on: March 12, 2026, 10:37:52 PM »
Neither did Miami which is why this is a discussion.  If they HAD gone undefeated then they'd get an auto-bid. 
Well they did go undefeated during the regular season, which is what I am talking about.

bayareabadger

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10169
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1015 on: Today at 08:11:33 AM »

I said teams with a pulse, you adjusted that to:Not all "teams with a pulse" are power conference schools.  I don't know (and see above, I don't really care) but did they reach out to decent mid-majors? 

Their OOC consisted of complete and total crap.  They played not one but two schools that are so insignificant that I've never heard of them and ESPN doesn't even have a link for them (Trinity Christian and Indiana University East).  There are plenty of "teams with a pulse" between Trinity Christian and the "power conference schools".  I'm not saying that I wouldn't include them unless they played Duke, just that being literally 0-fer the season in Q1 and only 2-0 in Q2 is a BIG problem for me when the math unequivocally says no. 
Well that's a silly dodge, now isn't it? "But what about other midgets?" he protests. And if they had a few more midgets ... there wouldn't be much acquiescence. It's a challenge with that strain of logic, if they had a bit more or a bit more, they'll always be short for someone complaining. (The absolute body bag game, IU East and such, are their own sort of interesting side track, and if we want to talk about that separately, it's sort of interesting in all this) 

The schedule was crap (and they were undefeated) in large part because teams like yours and mine were too chickenshit to schedule them. And if the answer is, "they just looked too good despite not being that good, and now that's the stain on their case," that is what it is, but it's OK to live like that. 

It's funny, if you were less emotional about all this, it wouldn't me much of an argument, just a dull convo. But you get all riled up, and here we are. 

MaximumSam

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 523
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1016 on: Today at 08:18:09 AM »
Took off today, all the games are bangers. Well, OSU might get run off the court but the other games are bangers. Supposed to be super windy so hopefully a tree doesn't fall on the house. 

bayareabadger

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10169
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1017 on: Today at 08:19:48 AM »
I'm operating on the assumption that those, along with their NET, KenPom, and Torvik rankings will plummet on the basis of a neutral court loss to a 200+ ranked opponent. 

Honestly, do ANY of the bubble teams have a loss as bad as losing a neutral court game to UMASS?  I assume a few of them might but I'm not sure. 
See, this one of the issues with talking about "data" when you don't understand the data. 

Off the loss, they fell a couple spots in Torvik, stayed flat in KenPom, did drop 10 in NET. 

In resume, they slipped six spots in KPI to 53, WAB was already updated and are 28th in SOR. 

(As for the last question, strangely yes. TCU lost to New Orleans at home. NC State lost to GA Tech, about 25 spots better, at home)

bayareabadger

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10169
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1018 on: Today at 08:20:11 AM »
Took off today, all the games are bangers. Well, OSU might get run off the court but the other games are bangers. Supposed to be super windy so hopefully a tree doesn't fall on the house.
My 1 pm meeting is going to be ... not well focused on.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 35301
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1019 on: Today at 08:54:38 AM »
Well, Wisconsin very nearly Wisconsined away its 18-point lead over Washington, but hung on for the win. Phew. Let's see how the three is flowing tomorrow against Illinois.
Extremely sloppy and complacent when it got to 18. It's almost like they quit.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 35301
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1020 on: Today at 09:16:55 AM »
Why so much talk about Miami (OH) on the B1G Basketball Thread?

Miami (OH) would be maybe a 2 win team in this league. 

Maybe.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11932
  • Liked:
Re: 2025-2026 B1G Basketball Thread
« Reply #1021 on: Today at 09:23:16 AM »
Why so much talk about Miami (OH) on the B1G Basketball Thread?

Miami (OH) would be maybe a 2 win team in this league.

Maybe.
Agreed and this is why it is silly to even consider including them.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.