If you do that, might as well reseed when you go to the neutral site
Question:
What are we trying to accomplish?
I guess that is really multiple questions:
- What do you think the league IS trying to accomplish?
- What do you think the league SHOULD BE trying to accomplish?
The league is probably trying to maximize revenue. From that standpoint, I *THINK* the logical thing would be to give the bubble teams the best chance to get in. I think the league's traditional "feed-in" method accomplishes this.
For this year, my team is the closest to the bubble so if the league's goal is to help bubble teams, what they have laid out for Ohio State is:
- A Wednesday game (Iowa) where they will be a distinct but not prohibitive favorite.
- A Thursday game (Illinois) where they will be a distinct but not prohibitive underdog.
- A Friday game (Maryland) where they will be a near-prohibitive underdog.
Frankly, I see this as nearly ideal but that varies by season/team.
Ohio State has some great quality wins (neutral blowout of Kentucky, road win over Purdue) and a solid computer ranking (35th in BPI, 36th in NET, 34 in KenPom). They are only 6-11 in Q1 but they are 3-3 in Q2 and 8-0 in Q3 and Q4.
Indiana but comparison has a better record by two games (19-12 vs 17-14) and a better league record by a game (10-10 vs 9-11) but Indiana's computer rankings are atrocious (52nd in BPI, 52nd in NET, 44th in KenPom). They are worse than tOSU in Q1 at 4-12 but better in Q2 at 5-0 and they are 10-0 in Q3 and Q4.
Ohio State's SoS (10th per BPI, 13th per KenPom) is propping them up. Ohio State's biggest need is simply win volume. Their SoS is good enough that playing Iowa isn't going to materially hurt them and they don't really need additional quality wins, they just need wins.