header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: 2022 B1G Season Thread

 (Read 27435 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25280
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #168 on: July 13, 2022, 04:06:11 PM »
At Camp Randall !!!
Definitely. That's not going to change, ever.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #170 on: July 14, 2022, 10:04:26 AM »
I'm guessing A&M made a jump with their most recent signing class
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #171 on: July 14, 2022, 10:14:26 AM »
Yeah, that was still only 7 years, and they still were above .500 in 4 of them, and (as you said) 11-2 once.
The other thing here, to answer @Mdot21 's post is that cutoff points matter.

Note:
50 years is a rough cut off point for MSU
1972 is a terrible starting point for MSU because they were great for most of the 50's and 60's so by starting with 1972 you deprive them of possibly the best-ever era of MSU football. 

Conversely, Michigan was terrible (at least by their standards) for most of the 50's and 60's so 1972 is a really good starting point for them since it leaves out possibly the worst-ever era of Michigan football. 

For the 20 years prior to the last 50 (1952-1971):
  • MSU was #23 at .649
  • Michigan was #28 at .623

Thus, if you go back 70 years (1952-2021):
  • Michigan drops behind PSU into 5th
  • MSU moves up six spots to #30



FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #172 on: July 14, 2022, 12:50:30 PM »
College football updated national championship odds released for 2022 season

https://247sports.com/college/nebraska/LongFormArticle/College-football-updated-national-championship-odds-released-for-2022-season-190035348/#190035348_1

MICHIGAN WOLVERINES (WAS: +6000; NOW: +5000)

TEXAS LONGHORNS (WAS: +5000; NOW: +4000)

NOTRE DAME FIGHTING IRISH (WAS: +5000; NOW: +4000)

OKLAHOMA SOONERS (WAS: +5000; NOW: +3500)

USC TROJANS (WAS: +2500; NOW: +2000)

TEXAS A&M AGGIES (WAS: +3000; NOW: +2000)

CLEMSON TIGERS (WAS: +900; NOW: +1200)

GEORGIA BULLDOGS (WAS: +350; NOW: +350)

OHIO STATE BUCKEYES (WAS: +500; NOW: +350)

ALABAMA CRIMSON TIDE (WAS: +200; NOW +190)
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Abba

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 995
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #173 on: July 14, 2022, 01:03:15 PM »
interesting that only Clemson's odds got worse.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #174 on: July 15, 2022, 02:26:54 PM »
Speaking of NC odds, according to Saturday Down South a bet of $100 on either Bama, UGA, or tOSU to win the NC only pays $29.41 if one of them does while you could nearly triple your money by betting thr field if any other team wins the NC.



Abba

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 995
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #175 on: July 15, 2022, 02:42:22 PM »
I think I'd still take one of the Big 3 over the field.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #176 on: July 15, 2022, 09:35:11 PM »
not for 29 bucks

I'll take the field and put $100 on it

you want that action Abba?

I'll pay you $30 or you pay me $100
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Abba

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 995
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #177 on: July 16, 2022, 08:26:48 AM »
not for 29 bucks

I'll take the field and put $100 on it

you want that action Abba?

I'll pay you $30 or you pay me $100

Theoretically yes.  I just don't see Clemson, Notre Dame, Michigan, Oklahoma or Texas A&M being a serious contender.  The difference between #3 & #4 in SP+ is the same as between #4 and #23.

1) Ohio State 29.9
2) Alabama 28.6
3) Georgia 27.3

4) Michigan 20.6
.
.
.
23) Florida 13.9

If you're serious about a cash bet, you can PM me I guess.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #178 on: July 16, 2022, 08:39:31 AM »
nah, just messing

I'd just rather have a chance to win 100 than 30

and I don't think the odds are bad
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Abba

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 995
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #179 on: July 16, 2022, 08:55:17 AM »
Yeah, I mean I wouldn't like having to pick just one of those teams, but even if 1 or 2 has an off year, I still have another one who would be the heavy favorite.  Upsets happen, but I think I would need one of those teams to win 4 out of 5 times to make it worth it.  I think there is a decent chance we could have all 3 in the playoffs, so a lot has to go your way for the field to win this thing.  

I think it would really need to be like a Vince Young, Deshaun Watson level performance from a QB from the field to get it done.  So Caleb Williams or JJ McCarthy would need to blow up.  Maybe Quinn Ewers and Texas go nuts?  Hendon Hooker from Tennessee?  I'm not sure who else would be scary.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25280
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #180 on: July 16, 2022, 09:11:12 AM »
Why is there talk of an expanded playoff again?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20349
  • Liked:
Re: 2022 B1G Offseason Thread
« Reply #181 on: July 16, 2022, 03:09:36 PM »
Why is there talk of an expanded playoff again?
Because as is, it's boring.  Go back to 2, or expand it to 8 or 12, so at least we have some interesting games

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.