header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Misfits Thread

 (Read 398843 times)

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12140
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5866 on: August 04, 2020, 08:24:19 PM »
You were the one who complained the Russians' preferred candidate lost... When most people look at it and believe that their preferred candidate won--and has done some very interesting things to basically lay down at Putin's feet since.

I don't think the campaign colluded with the Russians. So the fact that the Mueller investigation didn't find outright collusion didn't surprise me. It did find obstruction of justice in relation to the administration's response to the investigation. Even so, that was pretty minor in its own right. 

The impeachment basically pointed to POTUS extorting the Ukraine for access to Congressionally-authorized aid in exchange for political favors. At the end of the day, even the Republicans in the Senate were basically "well yeah He totally did it, we're just not going to remove Him for it." If you don't think His sudden interest in the Ukraine was related in SOME way to Russia, I ask where it came from? He's not exactly someone who has taken a lot of interest in the corruption within any other governments. 

The dude's entire MO has been "if you're nice to me, you can do whatever you want, and if you're mean to me, you're PNG in the eyes of my administration." It's never about what's right or wrong, it's about what benefits Him personally. Literally He craps on our democratic allies while never has a bad thing to say about tin-pot dictators elsewhere. He gets "beautiful" letters from North Korea but all our Euro allies are weak.

As it relates to Russia, I can only think of two possible explanations for His behavior:


  • Someone in Moscow has SERIOUS dirt on POTUS, whether it's personal and embarrassing, or whether it's related to His business dealings (which might explain His herculean fight against releasing His tax returns). Whatever it is, He's sincerely scared and over the barrel that it will become public and is doing things contrary to our national interest to keep it quiet.
  • Putin is an absolute master of flattery, and is playing into POTUS' ego every chance he gets. POTUS has shown that if you flatter Him he'll do nearly anything for you, whereas if you're "mean" to Him He'll attack at every opportunity. Putin's smart enough to play this chump like a fiddle, and He's vain enough to fall for it. 


I'd like to think I'm an even-handed guy, but I think the opponents slogan should be simple: Make America America Again.

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5794
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5867 on: August 04, 2020, 09:16:46 PM »
I never complained.  Sam did by inference.  

You see the world your way, I see it mine.  I would not use “ most people” in some of your views.

It’s all good.  


I conceded that “ the guy” is a POS, but My bigger point, which you seemed to either miss or ignore, is the “ other side” has had nothing to offer but their insane pursuit of the Orange man in their head.  They have done nothing, tried nothing and contributed nothing.   Orange man horrible!!!!!  Ok , so we agree.  But what have they done but waste time and money. ( and tell a lot of lies) 

They don’t get a pass with me. Wasted roles and wasted votes and wasted money.  Every damn one of them.  He is the outsider.  The guy like Badge mentioned who came from public life, and will return. They are all career politicians.  We serve them.  It’s all wrong. And when he leaves it won’t change the fact that they are all worthless politicians.   They will continue to screw up, and will blame him for as long as they can, but they can’t play that card forever.  These are people who think the best thing that has happened is the pandemic, since that will finally get them back the power they so crave.  They barely try to hide that. 
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18799
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5868 on: August 04, 2020, 10:16:04 PM »
Yeah, we're on different planets.  
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5869 on: August 04, 2020, 10:20:25 PM »
Fixed it, meant conservative (red, because they don't want liberals to be labeled as red).

Confusing.
That red-blue thing switched at some point in the '80s.  Republicans were true-blue and Democrats were red like the commies they made excuses for when the alternative was someone like (shudder!) Barry Goldwater.
Play Like a Champion Today

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5870 on: August 04, 2020, 10:30:24 PM »
Sure, though popular support can seem to swing wildly. For example, in recent history just look at how we've viewed kneeling for the national anthem, or legalizing gay marriage. While there is no question people worked very hard on those issues, to some extent it's just people being confronted with a new idea and realizing it's fine despite initial reservations.

The EC seems like something that could be like that. Some people's vote counting more than others is dumb. Candidates ignoring half the states is dumb. Call me an optimist but we will eventually hit less dumbness in our system.
Many of the anti-democratic features we've been discussing work precisely to slow down any response to those wild swings in public opinion.  I would say that is a good thing.
IMO, the EC is not "dumb."  That would imply that it doesn't accomplish anything that it was designed to accomplish.  But that is not the case.
Is it crystal-clear exactly how presidential candidates would campaign without the EC, and how that would somehow empower more voters, as opposed to empowering the producers of imaginary votes like those in Cook County, IL, when elections are close and additional votes are needed?
I'm sure there are many non-EC scenarios in which some voters would have as little incentive to vote as they do now.
Play Like a Champion Today

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5871 on: August 04, 2020, 10:35:02 PM »
Fair enough.

I still don't really trust state governments and probably feel the people's vote is probably a better route, that is what it is. Maybe it would be better, maybe it would just be a different kind of sliminess. Who is to say?
I'm curious why you would put greater trust in the national government which is so much larger, farther away, and harder for you to influence than the state government.
Progressives distrusted state governments just like they distrusted political parties.  Just like most of them distrusted most voters, actually.  But I've never seen a clear explanation of why they thought that devils ran state governments but angels went to "serve" in Washington.
Play Like a Champion Today

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5872 on: August 04, 2020, 10:42:39 PM »
I mean, they did hold people as property, which was acknowledged in the constitution. I think it would be fair to say this country got in some ways better when that stopped.
It's interesting.  You know this, of course, but slavery is not mentioned by name in the Constitution.  Slaves were "people held to service."  It's almost like the Framers were ashamed of it.  Actually, the majority of them were.  That was Lincoln's theory, anyway.  And there was the belief (or perhaps wishful thinking) that slavery was dying out and would be insignificant in a generation or two.  That might have been the case had Eli Whitney not invented the cotton gin.
In 1787-88, we didn't have a choice of having a United States with slavery or a United States without slavery.  Our choice was a United States with slavery (with the potential of abolishing it in the future) or no United States.
Play Like a Champion Today

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5873 on: August 04, 2020, 10:45:20 PM »

Is it crystal-clear exactly how presidential candidates would campaign without the EC, and how that would somehow empower more voters, as opposed to empowering the producers of imaginary votes like those in Cook County, IL, when elections are close and additional votes are needed?
I'm sure there are many non-EC scenarios in which some voters would have as little incentive to vote as they do now.
I mean, it still just would empower some theoretical producers of imaginary voters, just ones in different places. If you could find a way to be corrupt in Cincinnati Fort Myers, you could swing the presidency. 

It's been interesting because I've lived in one state where candidates go in general elections and three others that only get primary folks. Just strikes me as redistribution. 

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5874 on: August 04, 2020, 10:46:31 PM »
If they thought it was infallible I don't think they would have included an amendment process
That's right.  The amendment process is difficult, but it's been successfully used 27 times.
I don't think the Framers anticipated the degree to which the Constitution would be altered by judicial fiat and by Congress effectively handing over its legislative powers to the Executive Branch.
Play Like a Champion Today

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5875 on: August 04, 2020, 10:51:45 PM »
It's interesting.  You know this, of course, but slavery is not mentioned by name in the Constitution.  Slaves were "people held to service."  It's almost like the Framers were ashamed of it.  Actually, the majority of them were.  That was Lincoln's theory, anyway.  And there was the belief (or perhaps wishful thinking) that slavery was dying out and would be insignificant in a generation or two.  That might have been the case had Eli Whitney not invented the cotton gin.
In 1787-88, we didn't have a choice of having a United States with slavery or a United States without slavery.  Our choice was a United States with slavery (with the potential of abolishing it in the future) or no United States.
I mean, we can say they were ashamed, but many still did it. I respect there would've been no US without it. And thus, I believe that what the framers laid out was not perfect. It was a product of its time and it was going to need to evolve. 

OTOH, I will say, if we can make the sixth amendment a thing, I'd gladly go back to that ideal. 

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5876 on: August 04, 2020, 10:52:13 PM »
They have. They came here to flee what many want this country to become.
Maybe many/most of the Chinese who are here came for similar reasons.
Play Like a Champion Today

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5877 on: August 04, 2020, 10:53:40 PM »
No Sam.  Let me give you an example of a real life conspiracy theory. I see this on average once or twice a week:

1. Media reports major problem with mail in balloting. Other Media outlets join in and discuss
2.  POTUS says there is major problem with mail in voting
3. Conspiracy theory born and spread..”POTUS” suppressing vote by discussing challenges of mail in voting POTUS fear mongering.
lol.  That’s a conspiracy theory.
my post was just an example of something that could happen.
Add this: POTUS is coincidentally screwing around with the USPS's ability to handle mail-in ballots.
Play Like a Champion Today

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5878 on: August 04, 2020, 10:55:40 PM »
I'm curious why you would put greater trust in the national government which is so much larger, farther away, and harder for you to influence than the state government.
Progressives distrusted state governments just like they distrusted political parties.  Just like most of them distrusted most voters, actually.  But I've never seen a clear explanation of why they thought that devils ran state governments but angels went to "serve" in Washington.
I don't put much trust in the national government, but I don't mind when a more general electoral system has a direct tie to the people. That's just me. I think direct mechanisms aren't bad. 

It's not really a matter of trusting national over state. It's a matter of trusting the people over the state government with one sixth of the three branches. And perhaps I don't trust the people all that much (I don't), but I trust most state governments less. 

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #5879 on: August 04, 2020, 11:00:38 PM »
I conceded that “ the guy” is a POS, but My bigger point, which you seemed to either miss or ignore, is the “ other side” has had nothing to offer but their insane pursuit of the Orange man in their head.  They have done nothing, tried nothing and contributed nothing.  Orange man horrible!!!!!  Ok , so we agree.  But what have they done but waste time and money. ( and tell a lot of lies)

They don’t get a pass with me. Wasted roles and wasted votes and wasted money.  Every damn one of them.  He is the outsider.  The guy like Badge mentioned who came from public life, and will return. They are all career politicians.  We serve them.  It’s all wrong. And when he leaves it won’t change the fact that they are all worthless politicians.  They will continue to screw up, and will blame him for as long as they can, but they can’t play that card forever.  These are people who think the best thing that has happened is the pandemic, since that will finally get them back the power they so crave.  They barely try to hide that.
So the first part interests me because that's in essence been the role of a party without the White House but with a house of congress. For six years before the current guy walked in, the policy was mostly obstruction. And in some folks' minds, that's probably a good thing. Often folks prefer a slower moving government. The fellow who looks like a turtle wouldn't help Barry, and the other side likely won't help the current guy. Way of the wold.

The second part makes me wonder about the thoughts on the 17th amendment. "They are all career politicians.  We serve them.  It’s all wrong. And when he leaves it won’t change the fact that they are all worthless politicians." I assume that speaks somewhat to both sides, and I'd assume longtime folks in state gov aren't worlds better. So why would one say that group should be vested with control of half of congress. So they can pick or choose their men and women in those roles?

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.