header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Misfits Thread

 (Read 398491 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37403
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #756 on: March 12, 2020, 11:19:14 AM »
Gavin Newsom just announced that all gatherings of over 250 people should be cancelled. Wife and I are planning to go to A Bronx Tale at our local OC theater (Segerstrom) tonight, and she's concerned whether we should go or not--or if Segerstrom will even continue holding shows.

why the arbitrary number of 250?

why not 500 or 100 or 50? 
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25053
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #757 on: March 12, 2020, 11:22:18 AM »
Seems arbitrary.

So, 249 is OK, but 250? No way!!
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37403
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #758 on: March 12, 2020, 11:25:44 AM »
hopefully some math behind it

so the consequence of one person affecting 200 of 250 people is the contamination of 200 x 10 = 2000

much better than one person affecting 500 folks

2,000 more affected walking around is OK, but 5,000 is bad 
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17621
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #759 on: March 12, 2020, 11:32:07 AM »
There are statistical reasons for it, but it's still not ever going to be hard and fast.  As pointed out, is there a statistically significant difference between 250 people, and 249?  No, of course not.

In Austin our large-gathering ban is 2,500 people.  So perhaps we're doomed???


betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12135
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #760 on: March 12, 2020, 11:35:51 AM »
why the arbitrary number of 250?

why not 500 or 100 or 50?
I know it came from the CDC. Originally they were talking about >1000 people, but they brought it down to 250.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37403
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #761 on: March 12, 2020, 12:04:43 PM »
next week, if things go south, they could move it to 10
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37403
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #762 on: March 12, 2020, 12:06:12 PM »
There are statistical reasons for it, but it's still not ever going to be hard and fast.  As pointed out, is there a statistically significant difference between 250 people, and 249?  No, of course not.

In Austin our large-gathering ban is 2,500 people.  So perhaps we're doomed???


another fantastic reason to never move there
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17105
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #763 on: March 12, 2020, 12:12:40 PM »
next week, if things go south, they could move it to 10
No worries - the only time I panic buy is at last call
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20280
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #764 on: March 12, 2020, 12:17:15 PM »
Same, we have tickets to a show tomorrow, and are hoping they just cancel it, so we don't have to make a call.

MichiFan87

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 796
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #765 on: March 12, 2020, 12:25:59 PM »
And now the Ivy League schools are all cancelling the rest of their spring sports seasons.....
“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing”
― Bo Schembechler

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37403
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #766 on: March 12, 2020, 12:32:35 PM »
No worries - the only time I panic buy is at last call
the bar in my small town has been closed more than open the past 5 years
I've learned to drink at home and alone if pushed
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12135
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #767 on: March 12, 2020, 12:36:02 PM »
the bar in my small town has been closed more than open the past 5 years
I've learned to drink at home and alone if pushed
When I drink alone... I prefer to be by myself.

Although...


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25053
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #768 on: March 12, 2020, 12:37:27 PM »
the bar in my small town has been closed more than open the past 5 years
I've learned to drink at home and alone if pushed
You need to open a bar.


I only drink when I'm alone, or with people.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12135
  • Liked:
Re: 2020 Offseason Stream of Unconciousness
« Reply #769 on: March 12, 2020, 12:38:28 PM »
Is it just me that thinks maybe this is starting to go beyond prudence and into CYA mode? 

That it's just a race to out-response each other? 

I.e. that events are just being cancelled because if someone is LESS prudent than some other entity and something goes wrong, they'll get a PR b!tch-slap, and they want to avoid that rather than actually making these calls based upon legitimate risk assessment? 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.