header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game

 (Read 2818 times)

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17168
  • Liked:
Re: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2020, 10:50:26 AM »
Yes, but I don't think you can build that way at MSU.  It's what also concerns me about Locksley at Maryland.
What way?MD didn't walk into an ideal situation nor did he leave it that way.Have to see if he can make some inroads with kids.Many want to play right away and won't get that at the blue bloods,so he has that angle if he can sell it.He coached under Saban and Tressel so there's that
« Last Edit: October 25, 2020, 10:56:13 AM by MrNubbz »
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11243
  • Liked:
Re: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2020, 11:18:47 AM »
Tucker seems more like the kind of guy that Dantonio would have hired as DC, from the Tressel friends and family tree. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20349
  • Liked:
Re: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2020, 11:35:23 AM »
What way?MD didn't walk into an ideal situation nor did he leave it that way.Have to see if he can make some inroads with kids.Many want to play right away and won't get that at the blue bloods,so he has that angle if he can sell it.He coached under Saban and Tressel so there's that
He seems like he could be a great face of the program type guy, who kills it on the recruiting trail, more than an Xs and Os guy.  That's not how it works at MSU.  The problem at the end for Dantonio was (1) his staff, particularly on offense was doing a terrible job developing talent; (2) Blackwell was killing his ability to recruit the state; (3) Kentucky and Cincinnati started going after the Ohio kids that OSU wasn't offering that Dantonio was making a killing on early in his tenure.

Tucker is coming in here, and getting in to some top 5s or whatever from some much bigger fish, but you don't get points for getting recruits to consider you, when they previously would not have.  And none of those guys are ultimately picking MSU.

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13106
  • Liked:
Re: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2020, 12:06:23 PM »
I think some of the results this year are going to be extra special.  Rutgers had 276 yards and 38 points.  Sparty had 7 turnovers.  Honestly they look a lot like last year, with their inability to run the ball with any sort of success. Rutgers should be a sort of competent outfit this year.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11243
  • Liked:
Re: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2020, 12:15:50 PM »
When you get a lot of turnovers, it is tough to rack up a ton of yards. 

It's like playing NCAA FB on easy mode, where your offense hardly ever sees the field because you are returning kicks, interceptions and fumbles for TDs, then giving them back the ball. You get a safety, return the kick for a TD, and get the 2 pt conversion, that's 10 points, with zero yards of offense. If you do get the ball, it is inside the red zone and you score on your first play. It's not unheard of to have more points than yards. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37597
  • Liked:
Re: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2020, 12:27:59 PM »
obviously a tough loss for Sparty, but it's the first game.  7 turnovers.

the TO thing can't be that bad all season

Sparty isn't as bad as they looked Saturday

Rutgers probably not as good
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20349
  • Liked:
Re: Rutgers (1-0) at Michigan State (0-1) Post Game
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2020, 12:46:41 PM »
When you get a lot of turnovers, it is tough to rack up a ton of yards.

It's like playing NCAA FB on easy mode, where your offense hardly ever sees the field because you are returning kicks, interceptions and fumbles for TDs, then giving them back the ball. You get a safety, return the kick for a TD, and get the 2 pt conversion, that's 10 points, with zero yards of offense. If you do get the ball, it is inside the red zone and you score on your first play. It's not unheard of to have more points than yards.
Yes, but even on a per play basis, they were bad.  They recovered a fumble at the 1, and it took 5 plays for them to score.

Rutgers averaged just 3.8 ypp, meaning after one game, MSU's defense is #4 nationally in that stat.  Granted Penn State is #2

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.