header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: 16-team playoff talk for 2026 and beyond

 (Read 7980 times)

jgvol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5963
  • Liked:
Re: 16-team playoff talk for 2026 and beyond
« Reply #84 on: June 11, 2025, 10:13:48 AM »
another reason I don't/haven't used AI for anything

Manning didn't like Osborne's Huskers, neither did Florida

AI can't even count to six.


The Tennessee Volunteers have appeared in the Citrus Bowl five times, with a record of 4-1. They won against Maryland in 1983, Ohio State in 1996, Northwestern in 1997, and Michigan in 2002. Their sole loss was to Penn State in 1994. In their most recent appearance in 2024, they defeated Iowa 35-0. 


Here's a more detailed look: 


  • 1983: Beat Maryland 30-23
  • 1994: Lost to Penn State 31-13
  • 1996: Beat Ohio State 20-14
  • 1997: Beat Northwestern 48-28
  • 2002: Beat Michigan 45-17
  • 2024: Beat Iowa 35-0





MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
  • Liked:
Re: 16-team playoff talk for 2026 and beyond
« Reply #85 on: June 11, 2025, 10:19:44 AM »
Ummmm......



Montana wore 3 at ND and I know GT hasn't been great, but they're not mid-MAC status.  Johnson didn't wear 16 at any level I'm aware of..... FFS


Google's AI hallucinates at a much higher rate than ChatGPT or Grok, in my experience.  I mostly ignore it and still use Google only for web searching.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22860
  • Liked:
Re: 16-team playoff talk for 2026 and beyond
« Reply #86 on: June 11, 2025, 10:23:13 AM »

Google's AI hallucinates at a much higher rate than ChatGPT or Grok, in my experience.  I mostly ignore it and still use Google only for web searching. 
I like to look at Google's little AI summary and catch the obvious errors, from the sources it itself is using to to create the summary.  

I agree that ChatGPT seems to be much more reliable.  Haven't used Grok.  I have used Copilot, we have the paid/licensed versions at work and it's pretty good too.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22010
  • Liked:
Re: 16-team playoff talk for 2026 and beyond
« Reply #87 on: June 11, 2025, 10:49:46 AM »

Google's AI hallucinates at a much higher rate than ChatGPT or Grok, in my experience.  I mostly ignore it and still use Google only for web searching. 
Here's the fun part and why I shared this....I didn't seek out the AI page.  It defaulted to it.  The "All" tab wasn't the default.
So that's fun.

ChatGPT is also piss-poor when it comes to college football stuff.  It simply doesn't have the volume it requires to produce anything useful.  It also doubled down when I questioned an error in its response.  
That creeped me out.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.