I have an ideology that I believe in, and you do too of course. But my ideology does not blind me to the truth, as yours does.
My accusations are always contextualized by examples - in this instance with Roady's "Kavanaugh Rule" in the OP.
Your accusations against me are never contextualized by anything, and always meander into generalizations about the left, the MSM, etc. Whenever you actually catch me being ideological, call me out for it at the time so I can properly defend myself. Funny you're never able to do that. I can see why you'd be intimidated considering the recent time you tried to call me out for posting a story containing false information but you couldn't actually cite anything that was false, and were forced, once again, to resort to generalizations about the MSM.
I can see the bias in the MSM, but you can't because it matches your own bias.
I see what you confuse as bias because you can't conceive of Trump actually doing anything wrong, which is an amazing level of denial.
Candy Crowley "fact-checked" Romney on stage during a live debate with Obama. Turns out she was wrong and Romney was right, but her admission of that was too little too late.
Happens to both sides all the time. Roady's "Kavanaugh Rule" has been sufficiently debunked, so you start whining about Romney?
You totally dismiss example after example of media bias
As usual, you have no examples and can only speak in generalities, which may be smart. Whenever you muster the courage to call me out for anything, it blows up in your face.
totally dismiss example after example of
You mean like the "Kavanaugh Rule?" I didn't totally dismiss it - I effectively debunked it. Big difference.
but it's the rest of us who are are "ideologically driven"
I was answering HK's question - sorry if I struck a nerve.