Area51 Board (non-moderated) at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

Best I can tell, ABC and NBC have spent ZERO minutes on the allegations against Biden.  (please correct me if I'm wrong).

Why would I bother to correct you when your mind is sealed shut?  Why are you pretending you consume all of each of these media outlets' content?  Of course they've all covered it.  Here's what ABC said yesterday (not that being right or wrong matters to you):  https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/womens-event-biden-navigates-lingering-sexual-assault-allegation/story?id=70403703

I'm happy to give Biden the benefit of the doubt (innocent until proven guilty), but you cannot really think that the MSM has given equal treatment of transgressions of Republicans and Democrats?

You're starting from a false premise - the only way to judge that honestly is for their transgressions to be equal.  How much coverage have all the sexual assault allegations against Trump ever gotten?  I would argue precious little.  Granted, they've been so overwhelmed by all his other scandals and there's only so much time, but still.  In 1998 during the Lewinsky scandal, if I adopted your "logic," then I could have argued that the MSM wasn't giving equal treatment of transgressions of Republicans.  Fortunately, I've been spared your persecution complex.  

You should value accuracy and credibility, rather than always contorting reality into "hidden agendas" in order to protect your ideological identity, which has literally become how you see yourself as a person.  I know you guys would like to believe that you're Christians first, but Limbaughism is your true religion - you're much more devout in your beliefs there.  Rush is God - God is Rush.  And those who say they, "rarely listen to Him anymore," don't even understand their own minds.  

My guess is that that if ABC and NBC start covering the Biden allegations, that means that the knives are out and the establishment has determined Biden too senile or unelectable
 
See?  There's always a rationalization or a conspiracy theory for reality - nothing is as it seems unless it confirms your bias.  Doesn't that trouble you, or are you that lacking in self-awareness?    

I debunked a slanted conclusion with a specific case rather than approach the topic thinking in generalizations.

Ideologically driven people like you and Texie are only looking to have your biases confirmed and your victim-status verified.  You can take a fact like, "Trump has received more negative headlines in the MSM during the first 3 years of his presidency than Obama did," and conclude that the press must therefore have an ideological bias against you.  The possibility never dawns on you that the headlines are (at least attemptedly) accurate, and that their negativity is justified.  You'd rather parse every innocent participle to prove how unfair the world is (that is, when you're not hypocritically accusing minorities of having a victim complex). 

I have an ideology that I believe in, and you do too of course.   But my ideology does not blind me to the truth, as yours does.  I can see the bias in the MSM, but you can't because it matches your own bias.  You seek confirmation of your biases, and you have found it in your "credible" media.  

As far as us "considering the possibility" that the headlines are accurate with regard to Trump and Obama, you also believed they were accurate with regard to Mitt Romney, John McCain, and George W. Bush.  Apparently you are blind to the fact that the MSM has a bias toward negative reporting about Republicans and positive reporting about Democrats.   Even Mitt Romney, as centrist as he is, had 75% negative media reporting.  Candy Crowley "fact-checked" Romney on stage during a live debate with Obama.   Turns out she was wrong and Romney was right, but her admission of that was too little too late.  You totally dismiss example after example of media bias, but it's the rest of us who are are "ideologically driven".   

Next you'll say, "yeah, but Biden's not getting the same (equally earned) negative treatment.  When you're shown that, in fact, he is getting negative treatment, including by the supposedly leftist media no-less (while Trump's sexual misconduct goes presently ignored), you disregard these facts as simply insufficient to poke holes in your narrative.  If forced to acknowledge it at all, it's the "Bernie sympathizers" on the left making it happen - there's no "real" intellectual integrity there.  There's always a rationalization for everything, while the truth sits right there in front of you.  Trump's only redeeming trait is that he's entertaining, and he's utterly unfit in every possible way (intellectually, morally, everything you can name) to be POTUS.  His only appeal to the right mainly appears to be that he allows whichever of his minions kiss-up to him the most free rein to deregulate whatever their donors want, and that he's a masterful troll of the left. 

Most on the right here are so hopelessly racked with bias that they have lost touch with reality. 

Says the most blindly partisan person on this board.