header pic

Area51 Board (non-moderated) at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' Scout-Tennessee a51 Crowd- Enjoy ROWDY discussion covering politics, religion, current events, and all things under the sun

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: ? Biden's VP ?

 (Read 1668 times)

fuzzynavol

  • seeker of passage
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10949
  • Liked:
Re: ? Biden's VP ?
« Reply #126 on: August 12, 2020, 10:21:56 AM »
It's never been investigated.  When you say it's "been thoroughly debunked", you mean the WaPo wrote an OP pretending to be news.  They don't care what went on because the Bidens are on their team.  There was never any investigation of the Politburo by the communists either. 

Now Pretend it was Trump's son in the exact same circumstances.  I want you to tell me in no uncertain terms that the WaPo, NYTs, and CNN would have "thoroughly debunked" the story. 
The only thing to "investigate" is whether Biden was acting on his own to protect his son's financial interests, or whether he was executing Obama Administration foreign policy, which has been confirmed as a matter of the public record.  All the other noise surrounding this story is simply deranged partisan politics.  

I don't know about his sons, but Donald Trump has significant financial interests in Russia, but that's not enough to convict him of anything in the way you have done the Biden's.  So if you're looking for double standards, you might look there.  

DunkingDan

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 26060
  • Liked:
Re: ? Biden's VP ?
« Reply #127 on: August 12, 2020, 10:27:21 AM »
President Harry S. Truman said: “The fundamental basis of this nation’s laws was given to Moses on the Mount.  The fundamental basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings…  If we don't have the proper fundamental moral background, we will finally wind up with a totalitarian government which does not believe in rights for anybody except the state.”

highVOLtage

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5166
  • Liked:
Re: ? Biden's VP ?
« Reply #128 on: August 12, 2020, 10:36:36 AM »
BW vote for the common good at highest rates of all groups.

So how is this not a racist / sexist statement? Black women are superior in their views and choices for America?

As to the election, who does this sway?  Biden already had nearly 100% of the black female vote.  Picking Harris probably doesn't gain Biden two dozen votes from that demographic.  Not sure how picking Harris is such a good move if you're trying to win the black female vote - Biden already has near total allegiance.

Maybe Biden is just trying to secure the 55 electoral votes in California?

ZenMode

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1119
  • Liked:
Re: ? Biden's VP ?
« Reply #129 on: August 12, 2020, 01:04:27 PM »
If one is pre-determined to see something innocent badly enough, then one will.  You don't have to be pre-determined to see the obvious.

I was willing to keep an open mind until about the 6th partisan investigation in a row finding no-wrongdoing.  You don't know what Rice knew or when she knew it.  Nor can you read the minds of the attackers.  If you're going to impugn someone's integrity, even a politician's, by saying they're lying HAS to be based on more than Fox News conspiracy theorizing (over an utterly irrelevant matter). 


Of course they were.  The video made by the blasphemers made the Muslims mad and made them protest and attack the embassy. 

Not blaming them in the sense that it was the American's fault so that they would be somehow exonerated by the pro-muslim left.  Do you think the Western press was "blaming" Charlie Hebdo for that massacre because they reported that they published a cartoon blaspheming the prophet? 

You think it panders to the politically correct "pro-muslim left" to portray the attackers as enraged blaspheme retaliators?  ReallyThat's the theory? 

Yes.  As I said above, you get to blame Americans/video makers/blasphemers and not have an official terror attack, that resulted in the death of 4 Americans, on your watch.

It's not logical that they would think they were going to sweep it under the rug in such a flimsy way. 
As I said, there are two options here:

1.) Every person in the Obama administration, involved with the analyzing/discussing of the details of the Benghazi attack, completely missed what was obvious to the average American or

2.) There was a coordinated effort to put out false information in the hopes of downplaying what was clearly a terror attack.


I find it incredibly hard to believe that not a single person said "Hey guys.... you know, this happened on 9/11.  Do you think maybe it was a planned attack?  Maybe we should look into this a little further to make sure we have this right before going public."

Sorry, I'm not buying it.  This appears to be as clear an attempt to deceive, aka "play dumb", same as the WMD's story in Iraq.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2020, 03:22:36 PM by ZenMode »

highVOLtage

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5166
  • Liked:
Re: ? Biden's VP ?
« Reply #130 on: August 12, 2020, 04:05:32 PM »
The only thing to "investigate" is whether Biden was acting on his own to protect his son's financial interests, or whether he was executing Obama Administration foreign policy, which has been confirmed as a matter of the public record.  All the other noise surrounding this story is simply deranged partisan politics. 


https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1293630199645560832

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.