my point is a stranger walked right up to a child and ended him. dropped him. callously pulled a handgun and sent a bullet through the head of a child who's siblings were mere feet away and adults were observing... and BECAUSE the child was white. not because 'the kid was riding his bike in his lawn', not because he was caught in the crossfire, not because of an accidental discharge, and not because of local gang activity or drug trade (not directly, anyway)... it was because this animal had an axe to grind against white people- against white children in particular- and was emboldened by media and groups of BLM... by celebrities calling for violence against WHITE people and specifically children...
and this is the results of those comments made by BLM, by MSM, and by celebrities that they nor you apparently will ever accept.
THAT is the story here.
now, there is also something else happening- and i get it... the police (the US Marshall's were involved- ask yourself why?) have sealed this circumstance, and the notion behind that is they are afraid this will incite dramatic response- which is what your left, your BLM, your ANTIFA, your MSM and your 'side' wants- to incite war... that is what these shit birds have been and are actively pursuing...
anyone with any sense whatsoever sees plainly the threat- the threat is "if you don't stand down and give us our way and the leadership we want, we will riot- we will destroy- we will target you (supporters of opposition) and we will target your children"... that threat has played out right in front of us several times...
in Minneapolis rioters destroyed fire apparatus's (trucks, if you would) enroute to a fire they started. they would not allow them to move. as a result children died in a blaze....... it was but briefly discussed by the media and only because the fire chief broke down in tears in a press conference discussing the riots and the FD's activities during... BLM has outright said to target white people- to target the children of white people... because they believe the answer to racism is more racism? does that make any sense? to even an indoctrinated leftist such as yourself? if so, please explain.
this child was targeted because of the color of his skin and 'punished' for the perceived (imagined) acts of his 'people', and executed.
you want to defend that? is that what you're doing here? or, are you trying to align it as more systemic racism that outrage over this child exists when it doesn't when it's a child of color? is that your 'game'? people who play stupid games win stupid prizes- and when those people involve their children in their games their children often win those prizes... this child was riding a bike in front of his home. he wasn't caught in cross fire. he wasn't impacted due to being adjacent a targeted person.. he was executed because of the color of his skin. period.
Now if it is the 'game' of media and police to keep this quiet for fear of response? that's one thing... if it's being ignored because it could undermine the narrative? that's another... you seem to favor the use of Occam's Razor- in some high and mighty display/demonstration of reasoning skills and intent to display intellect that is so frickin important for your types, and as if others aren't familiar with that principle.... use it now... which of those two options are more likely? is it being suppressed because of possible reaction? or, is it being suppressed because it is acid to their narrative?