Area51 Board (non-moderated) at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

When did Trump jump in bed with white nationalism?

His first questionable public flirtation came back in '89 with the "Central Park Five" scandal (google it), but I'd say it really kicked off during the Republican primaries back in '15.  

Or should I just assume that, lest be deemed ignorant?

You should more accurately be deemed to be in (partisan) denial.  

I didn't realize I needed to clarify that I (we) were talking about the contents of this thread.  

No, Trump's words are worse that Obama's words, and Trump's association with criminals far outnumbers Obama's as well. 

  
Which righties on this board does he share ideology with? Are you just stereotyping without proof?

In general, I support the Christchurch shooter and his manifesto. (I don’t think anyone here supports either)

His behavior is irrelevant, as we're only discussing ideology.  None of us knows the contents of his manifesto, but the Christchurch shooter attacked a group of Muslims, and there have been threads very recently in this forum saying that violence is the only way to defeat Islam.  Right Billy?  

This attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas.
 
That's right in line with what I read here - how many MS13 threads has Dan posted here?  Ideologically speaking, that sentiment is no different than the callous disregard expressed here for the children separated from their parents at the border.  

(You don’t attack someone for wanting to enter your country. You have proper border security to protect your sovereign Nation. Most countries do this? I think the majority of the board disagrees with him)

Behavior is irrelevant - again, we're talking about his ideology.

They are the instigators, not me. (all here would disagree)

Most here believe illegal immigrants are instigating the problem.

I am simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion. (all here would disagree)

His action of defending his country is about his behavior, which is irrelevant.  Complaining about cultural replacement is in-keeping with the general ideology of the righties on this board.  

In short, America is rotting from the inside out, and peaceful means to stop this seem to be nearly impossible. (agree with the first part- collapse of the family, etc. but not much to do with immigration and disagree with the second part)

That kind of sentiment is expressed all the time here - in even more radical terms.  It's also fairly common to read here that President Obama "hated American and wanted to destroy the middle class."  

The inconvenient truth is that our leaders, both Democrat AND Republican, have been failing us for decades. (agree, nothing to do with immigration)

It doesn't matter whether it has anything to do with immigration, what matters is if his ideological rantings would fit in on this board, and the answer is yes.

The takeover of the United States government by unchecked corporations. I could write a ten page essay on all the damage these corporations have caused, but here is what is important. (disagree, he sounds like a Bernie Fuzzy Liberal)

Fine - it would still fit in on the board.  

Due to the death of the baby boomers, the increasingly anti-immigrant rhetoric of the right and the ever increasing Hispanic population, America will soon become a one party-state. (not the only reason why the Dems will take over so disagree)

This isn't about whether or not you agree with his rantings, it's about whether or not he's too ideologically radical or too far right to fit in on the board.  Clearly he is not.  Only his bahavior is too radical - ideologically he's just one of the fellas.  

I lost interest

Maybe if you'd understood your challenge, you would have maintained interest a little longer.  Bottom line is that no one here agrees with his behavior, but he's not ideologically out-of-step with the righties on this board.